tds 0.100

Paul Vojta TWG-TDS@SHSU.edu
Mon, 16 Oct 1995 15:05:29 -0700 (PDT)


May I suggest the following diff:

*** tds.tex	Mon Oct 16 13:34:23 1995
--- tds.new	Mon Oct 16 15:02:40 1995
***************
*** 1220,1228 ****
  into different sections of the tree right at the top level).
  
  If documents could portably specify a directory part in filenames (as in
! \path|\input latex2e/file.tex|), the entire \abbr{TDS} tree might look
! different, because then duplicate ``filenames'' would be restricted to
! the 8.3 lowest-common-denominator.  However, this is not currently practical.
  
  \subsection{Macro Structure}
  The \abbr{TWG} settled on the 
--- 1220,1230 ----
  into different sections of the tree right at the top level).
  
  If documents could portably specify a directory part in filenames (as in
! \path|\input latex2e/file.tex|), restrictions on uniqueness of filenames
! could be relaxed considerably (with the cooperation of the macro packages),
! and the search path would not need to depend on the format.
! However, this is not currently practical, since no current {\TeX}
! implementation supports this.
  
  \subsection{Macro Structure}
  The \abbr{TWG} settled on the 

In the current wording, it's not at all clear to me how the TDS tree might
look different.

--Paul Vojta, vojta@math.berkeley.edu