<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2010/5/19 Peter Breitenlohner <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:peb@mppmu.mpg.de">peb@mppmu.mpg.de</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im">On Wed, 19 May 2010, Apostolos Syropoulos wrote:<br>
<br>
</div><div class="im"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
Which compiler and version?<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
I am using gcc-4.3.2 which is the developer version of the GNU compiler. The<br>
standard<br>
is gcc (GCC) 3.4.3 (csl-sol210-3_4-20050802) but I think it is too old.<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
Hi Apostolos,<br>
<br>
The whole gcc-4.x.y series seems to be plagued with optimization bugs. We<br>
have a library causing an ICE (internal compiler error) for 4.2.x. That was<br>
fixed in 4.3.x, but a similar (or the same?) ICE appeared again in 4.4.3 and<br>
is fixed in 4.4.4. Could well be that chktex also triggers some bug.<br>
<br>
So if 3.4.3 succeeds where 4.3.2 fails, you should use that older version.<br clear="all"></blockquote></div><br>OK I will try tomorrow with the old compiler.<br>A.S.<br><br>-- <br>Apostolos Syropoulos<br>Xanthi, GREECE<br>
<br>