[tlbuild] mtx and libp2c
rdt at cs.queensu.ca
Mon Apr 9 18:42:29 CEST 2012
>| >| > m-tx.lua suffice?
>|Do users invoke "mtx" now or "prepmx" or "pmx" or some combination
Karl: Currently, users can invoke the toolchain
prepmx -> pmx -> tex -> musixflx -> tex -> dvips -> ps2pdf
or just mtx, which is sym-linked to (or, on Windows, invokes) the
wrapper script mtx.lua that, by default, does all of the above
(and options to change the defaults).
>|In any case, the idea is that they will invoke "m-tx.lua" now?
>|That's surely fine as far as conflicts go, but in my experience it's
>|suboptimal to embed the implementation language in the command name.
>|With the -, I don't see a problem with just calling it "m-tx".
The script and the sym-link (or invoking binary) will, as proposed, be
m-tx.lua and m-tx, resp.
More information about the tlbuild