[tlbuild] tl09 build status
Peter Breitenlohner
peb at mppmu.mpg.de
Tue Jun 2 15:05:30 CEST 2009
On Tue, 2 Jun 2009, Ken Brown wrote:
> On 6/2/2009 7:35 AM, Peter Breitenlohner wrote:
>> On Tue, 2 Jun 2009, Ken Brown wrote:
>>
>>> Second question (probably for Peter): The build produces some warnings. I
>>> suspect that most or all of these are harmless, but I don't know for sure.
>>> I asked about this when I first started trying to build texlive and you
>>> (Peter) said to wait. Do you want to look at the warnings now?
>>
>> Hi Ken,
>>
>> I assume they are all harmless. To be sure, can you send me all the lines
>> from build log containing 'warning:'? Should be today because after
>> tomorrow I'll be away for about ten days.
Hi Taco,
I think you should decide about these two cygwin warnings:
../../../texk/web2c/luatexdir/luafilesystem/src/lfs.c:81:1: warning: "_O_TEXT" redefined
/usr/include/sys/_default_fcntl.h:63:1: warning: this is the location of the previous definition
../../../texk/web2c/luatexdir/luafilesystem/src/lfs.c:82:1: warning: "_O_BINARY" redefined
/usr/include/sys/_default_fcntl.h:64:1: warning: this is the location of the previous definition
They are for cygwin-1.7 so I couldn't check all details. On our cygwin-1.5
/usr/include/fcntl.h defines
_O_BINARY -> O_BINARY -> _FBINARY -> 0x10000
_O_TEXT -> O_TEXT -> _FTEXT -> 0x20000
this is then replaced in luatexdir/luafilesystem/src/lfs.c by
_O_BINARY -> 0
_O_TEXT -> 0
If this is the right thing to do, you should first undefine them,
otherwise only define them if not already defined.
Regards
Peter
More information about the tlbuild
mailing list