The difference among \text* and \math* is a question of <b>meaning</b>, not layout. Let me copy a piece o text from The LaTeX Companion (sec 7.4 on p. 347):<br><br>"...(in math formulas) individual shapes convey specific information. For example, bold upright letters may represent vectors..."<br>
<br>So, you don't use \math* just because you are in math mode, but because you need to set a specific meaning to a symbol, and this is (or might be) done changing the font (the more appropriate one is up to you).<br>
<br>The question is more or less the same as asking "what is the difference between \textit and \emph?" And the answer is that while \textit switch the font to an italic shape, \emph <b>emphasizes</b> the text, what can be done with bold faces, underlines, colors, italics (\textit, for instance) etc.<br>
<br>In time: the fonts associated to the comands \text* and \math* are different, although in the Computer Modern families they are equal in series and shapes. You can check this by loading a font package that does not have support for math fonts (utopia, for example).<br>
<br>[]s<br>Ivan<br><br>
<br>I mean, using the Computer Modern font families<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 13:27, P. R. Stanley <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:prstanley@ntlworld.com" target="_blank">prstanley@ntlworld.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div><br>
>P. R. Stanley wrote:<br>
>>Hi folks<br>
>>1. What effect does placing a letter [A-Za-z] in math mode produce,<br>
>>for example $x$ $A$?<br>
><br>
>It sets the letter in maths italic, which is similar<br>
>to (but not the same as) text italics.<br>
><br>
</div>>>Sorry to be a pain, what is the difference between math italic and<br>
>>text italic? Where would one use math italic? For examplem is it<br>
>>for something as undane as a variable -- $ xy$?<br>
<br>
>----------[snip]----------<br>
<div><br>
>It's a great shame that (as far as I know) no-one has yet reported a<br>
>document from whence all of these things can be gleaned.<br>
</div>well, with my questions and the answers from the list we may have<br>
already started creating such a document. :-)<br>
<br>
Cheers<br>
Paul<br>
<div><div></div><div><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
TeX FAQ: <a href="http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq" target="_blank">http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq</a><br>
Mailing list archives: <a href="http://tug.org/pipermail/texhax/" target="_blank">http://tug.org/pipermail/texhax/</a><br>
More links: <a href="http://tug.org/begin.html" target="_blank">http://tug.org/begin.html</a><br>
<br>
Automated subscription management: <a href="http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/texhax" target="_blank">http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/texhax</a><br>
Human mailing list managers: <a href="mailto:postmaster@tug.org" target="_blank">postmaster@tug.org</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>