<br>Like Dave, I have many bitter memories... converting old Word files to new versions, converting Word files from Mac to PC and vice versa, converting WordPect to anything else... and despite being a TeXie, I still had to deal with it because I co-authored things with non-TeXies. Especially Word-on-Mac and Word-on-PC people cooperating on a mathematics reader gauarantee hours of fun. Equations being printed at twice the width AND half the height, or vice versa, incompatible figure formats...
<br><br>Actually I still have to deal with it these days. I co-organize two annual simulations of the United Nations for 15-18 year olds. Even in the smallest one there are 400+ kids from 18 countries, and they all bring their resolutions and policy statements and all with them in electronic versions. And it is amazing what variety of .doc and .rtf and .weirdness files pop up. All from different word versions (95, 97, 2000, XP, 2003, home, professional, CE,...) in different locales (try opening an English document written in Hungarian Word 97 Home in Dutch Word 2003 Professional). The horror... the pain...
<br><br>And then of course everybody tries to make it look "good" according to their own standards. Different fonts, typographic conventions, and gimmicks. I know of at least three completely different ways to create automatically generated linenumbers in Word now.
<br><br>As if this isn't enough, the kids "merge" resolutions: taking bits from several other resolutions, all of different origin, and paste them into any one of them.<br><br>Then everything that gets passed by the committes has to be collected into a "Resolution Booklet" with a uniform layout. Some poor sod (usually me) ends up spending countless hours trying to make everything a) uniform and b) looking reasonably ok.
<br><br>I'm starting to think it might be less work to print out the whole lot (in as far as the printer prints what is shown on the screen: WYSIWYG doesn't work over different keymaps) and type it in again in LaTeX by hand. Suggestions, anyone?
<br><br>And actually, if it helps anybody, I still have a 5.25" floppy disk somewhere with WordPerfect 1.0 on... (just one disk, and that version included a spreadsheet and database) :-)<br><br>Cheers,<br>Yuri.<br><br>
<div><span class="gmail_quote">On 8/21/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">David C. Walden</b> <<a href="mailto:dave@walden-family.com">dave@walden-family.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>> > Take a Word file from 20 years ago and try to read it with any<br>> > software around today.<br>>Can anyone give some real examples where you actually try this and<br>>report what happened?<br><br>
Not actual examples -- just bitter memories. The path that failed<br>for me was converting from an early version of Word for PC to<br>Word for Mac and then, years later, trying to convert back to<br>the then current Word for PC.
<br><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>TeX FAQ: <a href="http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq">http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq</a><br>Mailing list archives: <a href="http://tug.org/pipermail/texhax/">http://tug.org/pipermail/texhax/
</a><br>More links: <a href="http://tug.org/begin.html">http://tug.org/begin.html</a><br><br>Automated subscription management: <a href="http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/texhax">http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/texhax</a><br>
Human mailing list managers: <a href="mailto:postmaster@tug.org">postmaster@tug.org</a><br></blockquote></div><br>