<html>
Hasn't an important part of the problem been overlooked? <br><br>
At 02:58 08.04.06, Don Mainfort wrote:<br><br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite><font face="Times New Roman, Times">Also,
the print on front & back do not align - when looking at outer edge
of a page, the type of the even side is about a quarter of an inch shy of
that of the odd side.</font></blockquote><br>
Note that with book.cls this really must not happen. <br><br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite>\documentclass[final, leqno]{book}
<br>
\usepackage{natbib} <br>
\usepackage{amsmath, amssymb, amsfonts} <br>
\usepackage{epsfig} <br>
\usepackage{graphics} <br>
\usepackage{color} <br>
\usepackage{hyperref} <br>
\usepackage{rotating} <br>
\usepackage{lscape} <br>
\usepackage{latexsym} <br>
\usepackage{CJK} <br>
\usepackage{pinyin} <br>
\usepackage{setspace} <br>
\usepackage[outercaption]{sidecap} <br>
\usepackage{ccaption} </blockquote><br>
... the margins should be as with book.cls, shouldn't they? <br>
-- you might measure and mail the margins. <br><br>
Many years ago, some printers did strange things <br>
so you had to play with \hoffset to get the same <br>
margins on different printers. The problem cited <br>
above might be solved the same way, without <br>
`geometry'. <br><br>
As to "camera ready": I have recently seen some <br>
.tex files, especially what margins were set, and <br>
compared it with the ready book (my job is to make <br>
another book in the same style.) I found that the <br>
publishers chose their own margins, irrespective <br>
of the margins they received. (Indeed, I have the <br>
the printout that was sent to the publisher, it has <br>
the margins that I found set in the files.) So forget <br>
about your margins ... <br><br>
Hope, well ... <br>
Uwe. <br>
</html>