[texhax] lwarp package — Native LaTeX to HTMLconversion
d.p.carlisle at gmail.com
Tue Mar 22 08:51:35 CET 2016
On 22 March 2016 at 00:47, Philip Taylor <P.Taylor at rhul.ac.uk> wrote:
> Reinhard Kotucha wrote:
>> Sure, tex4ht is in advantage because it's using TeX's parser. What is
>> so impressive IMO is that now TeX files can be parsed properly by
>> another scripting language.
> Is this true, Reinhard ? Can /any/ TeX file now be parsed properly by
> another scripting language, including (for example) those that change
> catcode on the fly, those that use \uppercase / \lowercase to perform
> "TeX magic" and so on, or only those (relatively simple) files that use
> only basic LaTeX markup ?
> ** Phil.
I can only assume you've never looked at xii.tex, the example
mentioned earlier in the thread, (which is typical plain tex markup,
not "basic LaTeX markup" :-)
(it's on ctan or you've probably got a copy already in texlive)
More information about the texhax