[texhax] What can I about \\ added at par ends?
barr at math.mcgill.ca
Sat Mar 23 01:40:28 CET 2013
I tried that and got mysterious error messages. I don't know why.
On Fri, 22 Mar 2013, Bob Wilson wrote:
> Most text editors have global search and replace. I would recommend replacing \\<two newlines> with <two newlines>. This is probably the only option.
> Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 22, 2013, at 2:25 PM, Michael Barr <barr at math.mcgill.ca> wrote:
>> I have an ms that is to be published in the online journal I do the tex editing for. For reasons I don't want to go into, I cannot ask him to revise it; it was put into tex by a grad student, not by the author. The grad student ended every paragraph with \\ followed by a blank line. You can see the effect from this simple file:
>> This is a test of what \\
>> does to add to parskip\\
>> and again
>> And here it is without the\\
>> There are 1063 instances of \\ in the file and probably several dozen are actually appropriate, maybe a 100. (This ms compiles to 170 pages.) I am not about to go through it and take out the ones that shouldn't be there. One thing I tried was \parskip -5pt. This helped but are a few instances where the student "forgot" to add the \\. So is there any way to nullify the effect of \\ when it is followed by a blank line (or, presumably, a \par) but still has the correct effect otherwise?
>> The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in
>> moral philosophy--the search for a superior moral justification
>> for selfishness. --J.K. Galbraith
>> TeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq
>> Mailing list archives: http://tug.org/pipermail/texhax/
>> More links: http://tug.org/begin.html
>> Automated subscription management: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/texhax
>> Human mailing list managers: postmaster at tug.org
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in
moral philosophy--the search for a superior moral justification
for selfishness. --J.K. Galbraith
More information about the texhax