[texhax] "@" : vowel or glottal stop ? (was : Some puzzling TeX)
Arno.Trautmann at gmx.de
Wed Feb 23 22:12:10 CET 2011
Reinhard Kotucha wrote:
> On 2011-02-23 at 21:18:29 +0100, Arno Trautmann wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > would it be possible for one of you to turn this whole @-discussion into
> > a TUGboat article? I always wondered about the meaning of all the @s in
> > the code and it would be nice to get an overview over the things
> > discussed here. (I won't have time to write until april, otherwise I
> > would try it.)
> Hi Arno,
> it seems that the @s lack a well defined meaning. They are used quite
> arbitrarily and different authors have different conventions. Or did
> you recognize any rules?
No, I didn't. Therefore I hoped you did ;)
Of course everyone can use it the way s/he wants, but I was thinking of
only the plain or LaTeX kernel. Is it so arbitrarily in that code, too?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the texhax