[texhax] 'verbatim' inside 'raisebox'?
uwe.lueck at web.de
Wed Jun 17 10:49:02 CEST 2009
T Ziomek <ctz001 at email.mot.com> schrieb am 17.06.2009 02:43:07:
> Finally getting back to this after other distractions; sorry for the
> delay in replying...
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 08:39:46AM +0200, Uwe Lueck wrote:
> > It is well known that verbatim environments are difficult ...
> > http://mirror.ctan.org/macros/latex/contrib/fancybox/fancybox.pdf
> > discusses this on pp. 18ff. and offers some solutions.
> Yes, thanks. E. Krishnan referred to the same thing and that's what I
> ended up using.
Actually, he referred to fancyvrb. I suggested \savebox/\usebox instead because I reasoned that \raisebox is not reasonable with multiline content.
> I saw \verb before posting but since I'm doing multiline code listings
> it wouldn't handle my needs.
> It is also referred to in the relevant FAQ entry,
> <http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?label=verbwithin>, as Martin
> Schroder referred to with "RTFAQ, please." I unfortunately lost that
> email and can't reply directly to it but, "Ack, yes, sorry". I searched
> but didn't find that, probably a/c of looking for for LaTeX FAQs but not
> TeX FAQs.
I wonder whether posters really should be asked to RTFAQ.
The UK FAQ is often nice to read, but finding something specific may be difficult.
I have no better idea to enter "verbatim box" in this case, but you will not find "label=verwithin" this way soon.
And in this special case you then still have to read a lot about the varieties of the problem until you find the solution for your special problem.
More information about the texhax