[texhax] the \let command

[tom sgouros]

Phil: Thank you.  As I understand it, you meant that the \let only
captured the top-level definition of \t, and there was still a \t hiding
in that definition.  So when \t changes, the definition of \tie changes,
too.


Philip TAYLOR <P.Taylor at Rhul.Ac.Uk> wrote:

> tom sgouros wrote:
> 
> >  o Are you talking about the original definition of \t that is
> >    recursive, or is there something incorrect in my redefinition of \t?
> 
> The original : \t -> macro :-> \OML-cmd \t \OML\t
> 

Where can I learn what this means?  Surveying the latex.ltx code isn't
helping me.  Is this LaTeX or TeX?  

Many thanks,

 -tom

-- 
 ------------------------
 tomfool at as220 dot org
 http://sgouros.com  
 http://whatcheer.net