[texhax] latex default output font
will.adams at frycomm.com
Tue Feb 21 13:08:32 CET 2006
On Feb 21, 2006, at 5:41 AM, Uwe Lück wrote:
> Sorry, this seems dangerous to me -- what comes to my mind
> immediately is that this makes it (nearly) impossible to use
> \rmfamily occasionally (e.g. in an example about typesetting).
> Why not just
> ? I would have thought that this is what the creators of NFSS
> had in mind. -- And:
Probably, I was working from uncertain organic memory.
>> William Adams
>> senior graphic designer
>> Fry Communications
>> This email message and any files transmitted with it contain
>> which is confidential and intended only for the addressee(s). If
>> you are
> Could you please avoid this, William?
My apologies, it's attached out-bound, and I have no control over it.
It is beneath a proper sig-dash though, but that doesn't help much.
I've tried to limit posting because of it.
senior graphic designer
This email message and any files transmitted with it contain information
which is confidential and intended only for the addressee(s). If you are
not the intended recipient(s), any usage, dissemination, disclosure, or
action taken in reliance on it is prohibited. The reliability of this
method of communication cannot be guaranteed. Email can be intercepted,
corrupted, delayed, incompletely transmitted, virus-laden, or otherwise
affected during transmission. Reasonable steps have been taken to reduce
the risk of viruses, but we cannot accept liability for damage sustained
as a result of this message. If you have received this message in error,
please immediately delete it and all copies of it and notify the sender.
More information about the texhax