[texhax] TeX for the blind
will.adams at frycomm.com
Fri Dec 8 16:20:29 CET 2006
On Dec 8, 2006, at 9:50 AM, Chris Rowley wrote:
>> This sort of thing may get better for .pdfs once the Stixfonts
>> ( http://www.stixfonts.org/ ) are available, but even then will
>> probably need improvements in screen reader support ('cause I'm not
>> convinced that they'll read out a superscripted ``2'' as
> No, fonts will make no difference.
> Screen readers tend to do just that: they read a screen just like a
> person, making guesses about which symbol strings are words and ... .
It would make a difference is a superscript ``2'' is assigned a
different Unicode slot so that a screen reader could be configured to
read it as (say) ``to the power of 2''. Not sure if that's what's
being done w/ Stix or no, but it should be.
Of course, the problem here is this sort of thing is contextual ---
what about the instances when it means ``footnote #2''?
All of which is a good argument for a markup-rich source which can be
senior graphic designer
This email message and any files transmitted with it contain information
which is confidential and intended only for the addressee(s). If you are
not the intended recipient(s), any usage, dissemination, disclosure, or
action taken in reliance on it is prohibited. The reliability of this
method of communication cannot be guaranteed. Email can be intercepted,
corrupted, delayed, incompletely transmitted, virus-laden, or otherwise
affected during transmission. Reasonable steps have been taken to reduce
the risk of viruses, but we cannot accept liability for damage sustained
as a result of this message. If you have received this message in error,
please immediately delete it and all copies of it and notify the sender.
More information about the texhax