<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
David, I think so too.<br>
Michael<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 07/02/2016 12:45 AM, David Carlisle
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAEW6iOhUHN28b=qe1H4X9KrYkn1a4hLX0YTNV5bthJiO1fpT6Q@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr"><br>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On 1 July 2016 at 23:19, Reinhard
Kotucha <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:reinhard.kotucha@web.de" target="_blank">reinhard.kotucha@web.de</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<br>
<blockquote>Since all the old font commands are still valid
in LaTeX2e, though<br>
deprecated, no program should reject them deliberately.<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_quote">Well not really. They were never
really "deprecated" as they were _never_ defined in the
latex2e format.<br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_quote">They are defined in the standard
article/report/book classes and many contributed classes.<br>
<br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_quote">The koma classes recently stopped
defining them, which is a slightly brave choice but one the
class<br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_quote">author is entitled to make.<br>
<br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_quote">David<br>
<br>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>