<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:20120417034616.GB24469@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at"
type="cite"><font color="#3366ff">By svn checkout of the whole
development tree ... you don't want
to do that .. ;-)</font> </blockquote>
I believe you! :-)<br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:20120417034616.GB24469@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at"
type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap=""><font color="#3366ff">(besides the cases when binaries don't work, which is a pain)
</font></pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><font color="#3366ff"><font color="#993399">Yup, I feel that exact pain... ;)</font>
</font></pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><font color="#3366ff">Please work with Zdenek to check *why* it doe snot work. It should
definitely, as he is has older and newer CentOS running ...</font></pre>
</blockquote>
Okay, CCing Zdenek on this. But I don't know what other information
I can share. The binary of dvipdfmx in the x86_64-linux package
complained that it needed glibc 2.7, and my copy of CentOS 5.6 has
2.5. (When I rented the VPS it came with CentOS 5.5 - I upgraded it
to 5.6.) I don't know what version of glibc is on Zdenek's systems,
and whether he has a slightly different build of dvipdfmx for some
mysterious reason. In order to find out, I will send a separate
email just to him (to avoid problems with the mailing list) and
attach the binary that failed on my machine - he can try it there.
And conversely, if he wants to send me his binary, I'll be happy to
run it on my machine and report back. And if you or he wants me to
try other commands, let me know.<br>
<br>
Karen<br>
</body>
</html>