[tex-live] status of latex/contrib/calender
andreas at wuerl.net
Sun Jan 8 19:43:13 CET 2012
Thank you all for the clarification.
>From my point of view, the first paragraph of the statement in question only deals with the case that the software is going to be modified before is distribution, which is not the case here.
The second paragraph of the statement addresses distribution of the unmodified files and explicitly allows to take money for the distribution if it is only a nominal charge for copying etc.
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I think in this case a distribution of the calendar files is legal and covered by the original license.
Am 08.01.2012 um 16:48 schrieb Khaled Hosny:
> On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 02:36:05PM +0000, Philip TAYLOR wrote:
>> Norbert Preining wrote:
>>> Removed in 2008 due to license problems. It does not allow to be sold
>>> % You are not allowed to change this file.
>> The same is true for (e.g.,) tex.web or plain.tex
>> Why can they be included and Calendar not ?
> I believe this is not the problematic part, but:
> (a) you do not charge for the modified code
More information about the tex-live