[tex-live] Package invoice broken after the removal of realcalc
rf10 at cl.cam.ac.uk
Fri Mar 27 17:41:05 CET 2009
Norbert Preining <preining at logic.at> wrote:
> On Fr, 27 Mär 2009, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > I have a bug report  that says the invoice package in the latexextra
> > collection requires realcalc. It seems realcalc was removed due to a
> > nosell license, what would be the correct way of handling invoice then?
> > Remove it too? The documentation of invoice says that realcalc is
> > mandatory.
note that this is also a problem for miktex since that too doesn't hold
> Well, then users having a broken invoice have two options: either
> install realcalc manually into TEXMFHOME or TEXMFLOCAL, and/or bugger
> the author.
> Now, removal of invoice is a bad idea to my mind, since people might
> install it locally.
and this is a problem because?
if tl can't distribute a package, the team just has to accept that users
may well choose to install locally, surely?
More information about the tex-live