[tex-live] License auditing: Consequences

[Sebastian Rahtz]

Martin Schröder wrote:
>> Since Debian does not view documentation separately from software, it
>> is not surprising that they don't consider GFDL free.
>>     
>
> The pdfTeX manual is currently licensed under the GFDL (it seemed a
> good idea then). What are the preferred alternatives? Not GPL or BSD,
> please.
>
>   
Creative Commons ShareAlike

-- 
Sebastian Rahtz      

Information Manager, Oxford University Computing Services
13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431

OSS Watch: JISC Open Source Advisory Service
http://www.oss-watch.ac.uk