taco at elvenkind.com
Fri Aug 5 15:43:30 CEST 2005
Karl Berry wrote:
> The string "cpp-runtime-hack" does not appear anywhere in the current
> sources in TeX Live, BTW. Oh, looking at web2c/configure.in, it seems
> to be --with-cxx-runtime-hack. (I hate C++.)
Check, I got my plus-transliterations confused.
> Staszek's build will probably go against libstdc++ v5, which is better
> but not good enough, since Taco reported that Mandriva may ship without
> v5, with *only* v6. It's nice to see such concern for compatibility :(.
The v5 is in the distribution of course, but it is quite possible (and
becoming increasingly likely as time passes) that it will not have been
installed (by the user|installation program).
> (BTW, last year's lcdf binaries also dynamically linked against
> libstdc++, and I don't remember getting any bug reports about it.)
v5 has been with us a long time. But I remember similar headaches
from the previous libstdc++ transition, when v5 first appeared on
> because something in texinfo fails (don't kow how
> to make version.texi) Is this known/my fault, or should I attempt
> to isolate the error precisely?
> Texinfo builds fine for me. version.texi exists in my original
> distribution as an up-to-date file; it should not need to get rebuilt.
> Maybe your timestamps are munged.
Quite possible. It would not be the first time. I'll try fetching the
branch again with "force" and see if that helps.
More information about the tex-live