[tex-k] Re: Possible mini-bug in kpathsea/absolute.c?

[Olaf Weber]

Karl Berry writes:

>     Actually, on further thought, given that we are returning
>     absolute || explicit_relative, shouldn't this whole thing say:

> The || 1, or || 0, seems bizarre anyway, in terms of precedence.

It makes sense in terms of disabling the tail of complex expression.
It doesn't make the code readable or maintainable.

> Personally I rather doubt the AMIGA code has actually been compiled in a
> decade or so.

The AMIGA bit should probably just be removed at this point.

-- 
Olaf Weber

               (This space left blank for technical reasons.)