<html><body bgcolor="#FFFFFF"><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(26, 26, 26, 0.296875); -webkit-composition-fill-color: rgba(175, 192, 227, 0.230469); -webkit-composition-frame-color: rgba(77, 128, 180, 0.230469); ">On Jul 20, 2011, at 17:22, Arthur Reutenauer <<a href="mailto:arthur.reutenauer@normalesup.org">arthur.reutenauer@normalesup.org</a>> wrote:</span></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><span> Wasn't it for Cyrillic originally? I remembered it was the other way</span><br><span>round with respect to what you say, and that's how I told the story in</span><br><span>my e-mail. But that's the same idea :-)</span><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#005001"><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#0023A3"><br></font></font></div></blockquote><br><div> Sorry, you were of course right, I just realised: the original pattern set was for Serbocroatian in the *Latin* script, which is why they were later converted to Cyrillic, augmented with a few patterns added manually, and re-labelled as Serbian. Later, Dejan produced patterns for Serbocroatian in the Cyrillic script, completely equivalent to his original ones in Latin (to the extent that can be).</div><div><br></div><div> Arthur</div></body></html>