<br><br><b><i>Herbert Voss <LaTeX@zedat.fu-berlin.de></i></b> wrote:<blockquote class="replbq" style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(16, 16, 255); margin-left: 5px; padding-left: 5px;"> Herbert Voss schrieb:<br>> Martijn Frijlink schrieb:<br>> <br>>> If I compile the code in psdot_call.tex and convert it to pdf (see<br>>> Makefile),<br>>> I get Type 3 fonts. Only with "dotstyle=+" I do not get any Type 3 fonts.<br>>> Any ideas where these occurences Type 3 fonts come from ?<br>>> Any suggestion how to get rid of them ?<br>> <br>> I suppose you do not really know, what Type 3 means ...<br>> Type 3 defines a Glyph which is _not_ a Type 1, no more no less.<br>> _All_ PSTricks glyphs, which are not from a Type 1 font are also<br>> vector based, in PostScript notation a Type 3 glyph.<br>> <br>> This has nothing to do with a pixel based font.<br><br>I meant "in this case"
...<br><br>Herbert<br><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>pstricks mailing list<br>pstricks@tug.org<br>http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/pstricks<br></blockquote>I was about to raise the point ;-)<br><br>Actually the underlying problem is that psdot-calls, except those with "dotstyle=+", lead to non embedded fonts in the pdf-file of my thesis.<br>My printer, that is the company that will print my thesis in book-form, <br>only accepts embedded fonts.<br>Is it possible to make psdot-calls produce embedded fonts ?<br><br>Martijn<br><p> 
<hr size=1>Get your email and see which of your friends are online - Right on the <a href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=42973/*http://www.yahoo.com/preview"> new Yahoo.com</a>