# [OS X TeX] Looking for suggestions

Herbert Schulz herbs at wideopenwest.com
Fri Jan 27 23:11:37 CET 2017

> On Jan 27, 2017, at 11:34 AM, David Derbes <loki at uchicago.edu> wrote:
>
> Hi, all.
>
> I’m deep into a manuscript (with a few other folks) and one of us is bothered by an orthographic issue. The manuscript (Sidney Coleman’s lecture notes on quantum field theory, which we hope to get out by the summer) has many references to the action, $\int d^{4}x\,\mathscr{L}$, and the scattering matrix. Alas, both are typically denoted with the same symbol, $S$. Usually these two things are far apart enough to not cause confusion, but not always. At the moment we’re using $\mathscr{S}$ for the action and $\mathrm{S}$ for the S-matrix. Probably there is a better solution. We’re reluctant to use anything but some variant of $S$ for each of these. (We could introduce $\mathcal{A}$ for the action or something but that is not very traditional. I wish Feynman had used a different symbol for the action, but it’s too late now…)
>
> Has anyone solved the problem, or has anyone seen an elegant solution, to the overloading of this symbol?
>
>
> David Derbes
> Laboratory Schools, University of Chicago

Howdy,

Curious... what is \mathscr? Is that the same as \mathcal?

Good Luck,

Herb Schulz
(herbs at wideopenwest dot com)

----------- Please Consult the Following Before Posting -----------
TeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq
List Reminders and Etiquette: https://www.esm.psu.edu/~gray/tex/
List Archives: http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.macosx
https://email.esm.psu.edu/pipermail/macosx-tex/
TeX on Mac OS X Website: http://mactex-wiki.tug.org/
List Info: https://email.esm.psu.edu/mailman/listinfo/macosx-tex