[OS X TeX] OT?: Codea Lua programming environment for iPad
kfjelsted at gmail.com
Wed Jun 12 16:46:57 CEST 2013
Actually the Apple Coco interface does not limit the type of look and feel that one may wish to achieve.
The myth that accessibility drives a "lowest common denominator" or that when accessibility is considered it in any way limits the implementation is baseless if a mature environment that has accessibility designed into the foundation is utilized.
This excuse that accessibility limits an app is only viable when there is an attempt to implement accessibility in an environment where the APIs and structure were not enhanced to support it.
On Jun 12, 2013, at 9:34 AM, William Adams <will.adams at frycomm.com> wrote:
> On Jun 12, 2013, at 10:27 AM, Kevin Fjelsted wrote:
>> There is no evidence that this IDE would support accessibility so all the accessibility that exists in TexShop would disappear if it were rewritten in this environment.
> I would like to think that we could add _optional_ interface options in such a way that the additional feature would not interfere w/ the existing systemic structure and features integrated thereto.
> I would hate that we would choose to limit the system to a lowest-common-denominator based on interaction which is feasible through a Braille reader --- should the clipping of .pdfs go away, since it can't be accessed using the accessibility mode?
> William Adams
> senior graphic designer
> Fry Communications
> Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
> ----------- Please Consult the Following Before Posting -----------
> TeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq
> List Reminders and Etiquette: http://email.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/
> List Archive: http://tug.org/pipermail/macostex-archives/
> TeX on Mac OS X Website: http://mactex-wiki.tug.org/
> List Info: https://email.esm.psu.edu/mailman/listinfo/macosx-tex
More information about the macostex-archives