[OS X TeX] your wiki needs you?
schremmer.alain at gmail.com
Thu Sep 18 18:34:33 CEST 2008
On Sep 18, 2008, at 9:47 AM, cfrees at imapmail.org wrote:
> On Wed 17th Sep, 2008 at 21:39, Alain Schremmer seems to have written:
>> On Sep 17, 2008, at 6:27 PM, cfrees at imapmail.org wrote:
>>> On Wed 17th Sep, 2008 at 18:01, Alain Schremmer seems to have
>>>> True, but I think that you still vastly the admittedly fear
>>>> driven lack of understanding of people considering a possible
>>>> alternative to MS Word. This is of course not to belittle the
>>>> page 'Getting Started'.
>>> It depends on the sense in which they want an "alternative". If they
>>> want an alternative word processor, nothing will convince them to
>>> TeX - and nor should it. But if somebody wants an alternative
>>> that's different.
>> I don't see the difference. I have met a number of people who have
>> just expressed interest in LaTeX but said that they had heard
>> that it was hard to install, that the learning curve was steep,
>> etc and that they were not THAT interested. So, I don't think that
>> dividing the world into "word processor" addicts and people who
>> will not be able to live without an alternative approach?for what
>> reason would they? There are the people who are interested just
>> because it is different, there are those who are interested
>> because a friend of theirs has become a LaTeXite and they want,
>> usually to a very mild extent, to know what it is about, etc
> Maybe we just have different experiences. I've met people with this
> interest, too, but those people have only wanted to know about it -
> they haven't been interested in installing or using it.
In the case of the people I have in mind, the deterrence was there
all right because they have downloaded other stuff that they don't
use much, including in at least one case LyX.
> I'm not thinking of installation or set-up here - that can be, and is
> being, made a whole lot easier and more user-friendly. As you say,
> MacTeX etc. is a big step in that direction. But even if you use
> templates, macros, snippets etc., you still have to get used to seeing
> source code rather than formatted text. I think that's a big leap for
> most people.
True, but markup need not be very hard either and with good macros
and a flash mode, could be almost by-passed. My point is that for
"ordinary" mathematical stuff, LaTeX could be made to be as easy as
word processors. After all, why is LyX the only one? Why am I to
suppose that it is impossible to write a word processor in which the
algorithms are TeX instead of the usual ones?
>>> If somebody is comfortable with Word - even a little irritated -
>>> there's just not enough reason to go through the process of
>> Again, being uncomfortable with Word is not necessarily what
>> motivates people. You know, some people are just plain curious.
> I don't mean to underestimate this. Curiosity can be a big motivator.
> But I haven't actually met anybody in this category so either I just
> don't meet the right people or there are not very many of them. (Maybe
> the first - I really don't know.)
It probably depends a lot on where you live and, therefore, the kind
of people you meet.
>>> Which isn't to say it isn't good to make it seem less
>>> intimidating and
>>> more manageable or to soothe unfounded fears. But some of the
>>> fears are
>>> well-founded and there's no getting around that, I think.
>> While these fears had good cause, the causes were often
>> unnecessary and there used to be a "hermetic" side to LaTeX as
>> with Mathematics. A "club mentality" if you would. However, the
>> way I understand it, TeXLive and MacTeX 2008 are giant steps in a
>> direction I like, that of "the rest of us".
> I agree - some of the fears were - and are - quite unnecessary. But
> there is a remainder after you eliminate those.
> But maybe my experience is just biased - I know very few people who've
> shown any interest in LaTeX and even fewer who use it. So maybe I just
> underestimate the potential "market" for it.
I really think that you do—but then you are in good company.
> Then again, I wouldn't really recommend LaTeX to somebody in my field
> as things are. Way too many conferences/journals etc. won't take PDF
> submissions. So maybe that's part of it, too. If OpenOffice had
> been as
> good as it is now (on OS X), I'm not sure I would have switched to
> LaTeX. I only really did it because Word kept chucking my work away
> and I
> couldn't find a decent alternative at the time.
> Which isn't to say that
> I would consider switching to OpenOffice now - though I have been
> wondering recently if this wouldn't really be a whole lot more
> sensible. Turning LaTeX into Word is a real pain.
It certainly is.
-------------- next part --------------
----------- Please Consult the Following Before Posting -----------
TeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq
List Reminders and Etiquette: http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/list/
List Archive: http://tug.org/pipermail/macostex-archives/
TeX on Mac OS X Website: http://mactex-wiki.tug.org/
List Info: http://email.esm.psu.edu/mailman/listinfo/macosx-tex
More information about the macostex-archives