[OS X TeX] OT: low-tech bibliographic hyperlinking

Alex Hamann Alexander.Hamann at stud-mail.uni-wuerzburg.de
Wed May 2 19:45:11 CEST 2007


Am 02.05.2007 um 19:30 schrieb Bruno Voisin:

> Le 2 mai 07 à 18:50, Simon Spiegel a écrit :
>
>> Why don't you just use bibtex and biblatex? Much easier and more  
>> versatile.
>
> Just a reluctance (and material difficulty) to invest several days  
> learning to use new tools and customizing them to suit specific  
> needs, when for any particular project I can get what I need in  
> half a day of handwork say.
>
> *snip

>
> But you're certainly right that I should at least give a closer  
> look to BibTeX and all the bibliography-related packages. When time  
> allows...
>
Now, if you do that I second Simons suggestion to use biblatex. It  
will allow you to define the output format in LaTeX which you already  
know well. So the effort of learning and customizing should be not  
too bad. NatBib which you mentioned in a previous post is not even  
half as flexible.

Alex

> Bruno
> ------------------------- Helpful Info -------------------------
> Mac-TeX Website: http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/
> TeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq
> List Archive: http://tug.org/pipermail/macostex-archives/
> List Reminders & Etiquette: http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/list/
>

=============================================
please avoid sending me word attachements; see
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
for details and background



------------------------- Helpful Info -------------------------
Mac-TeX Website: http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/
TeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq
List Archive: http://tug.org/pipermail/macostex-archives/
List Reminders & Etiquette: http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/list/





More information about the macostex-archives mailing list