[OS X TeX] MANPATH, MANPATH_MAP and i-Packages
Bruno Voisin
bvoisin at mac.com
Fri Sep 8 12:45:41 CEST 2006
I think this issue has already been raised, but I'm not quite sure
what the answer/solution was.
The search for man pages has become more complicated in Tiger than it
used to be. MANPATH is now defined in /usr/share/misc/man.conf,
through a combination of several mechanisms:
- A few MANPATH entries are defined statically for all executables:
> # Every automatically generated MANPATH includes these fields
> #
> MANPATH /usr/share/man
> MANPATH /usr/local/share/man
> MANPATH /usr/X11R6/man
- The man page for any executable inside /dir/bin is searched
automagically inside /dir/man:
> # If people ask for "man foo" and have "/dir/bin/foo" in their PATH
> # and the docs are found in "/dir/man", then no mapping is required.
- That is, except when an explicit MANPATH_MAP entry defines the
relation an executable directory and a man page directory:
> # The below mappings are superfluous when the right hand side is
> # in the mandatory manpath already, but will keep man from statting
> # lots of other nearby files and directories.
> #
> MANPATH_MAP /bin /usr/share/man
> MANPATH_MAP /sbin /usr/share/man
> MANPATH_MAP /usr/bin /usr/share/man
> MANPATH_MAP /usr/sbin /usr/share/man
> MANPATH_MAP /usr/local/bin /usr/local/share/man
> MANPATH_MAP /usr/local/sbin /usr/local/share/man
> MANPATH_MAP /usr/X11R6/bin /usr/X11R6/man
> MANPATH_MAP /usr/bin/X11 /usr/X11R6/man
> MANPATH_MAP /usr/bin/mh /usr/share/man
In fact, when installing the TeX i-Package (and CLI activation has
been selected) a MANPATH_MAP setting is indeed added at the end of
man.conf, corresponding to the TeX-related binaries:
> ## TeX modifications start at Mon Aug 28 17:22:38 CEST 2006
> ## Do not remove previous line
> MANPATH_MAP /usr/local/teTeX/bin/powerpc-apple-darwin-current /usr/
> local/teTeX/man
> ## Do not remove next line
> ## teTeX modifications end at Mon Aug 28 17:22:38 CEST 2006
Problem is, the other i-Packages put their executables inside /usr/
local/bin and their man pages inside /usr/local/man, not /usr/local/
share/man as expected by man.conf. Hence, the man pages are not
found. I realized this when trying "man tiff2ps", where /usr/local/
bin/tiff2ps and /usr/local/man/man1/tiff2ps.1 had indeed been
installed by the libtiff i-Package (aka TIFF Reference Library).
What would be the best solution:
- Comment out the offending line
> MANPATH_MAP /usr/local/bin /usr/local/share/man
in man.conf, so that the default association of /usr/local/bin and /
usr/local/man is restored.
- Or create a symlink /usr/local/share/man to /usr/local/man.
- Or add a line
MANPATH /usr/local/man
so that /usr/local/man is included inside the search path for man
pages for all executables.
I suspect the second solution would break in case some other
installation (not through i-Installer) did attempt to put something
inside /usr/local/share/man. And, regarding the third solution, I'm
not sure whether I understood correctly how MANPATH works (ie, is it
always taken into account, even when a MANPATH_MAP tells otherwise).
Any thoughts?
Bruno Voisin
------------------------- Info --------------------------
Mac-TeX Website: http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/
& FAQ: http://latex.yauh.de/faq/
TeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq
List Archive: http://tug.org/pipermail/macostex-archives/
More information about the macostex-archives
mailing list