Some advantages of powerdot (was Re: [OS X TeX] powerdot and
lsequeir at fc.ul.pt
Thu Sep 22 15:24:05 CEST 2005
>Luis Sequeira said the following on 21.09.2005 12:30 Uhr:
>> I can think of several aspects in which powerdot is much better than
>The important question for me would be what can it do better than
>beamer. beamer is not depending on pstricks and therefore on dvips
>and combined with the pgf package i can't think of a better presentation
>class for LaTeX.
>I put instant coffee in a microwave, and almost went back in time.
> -- Stephen Wright
I don't know beamer all that well but, when I first looked at it, it
seemed that it did things better than prosper; but not only it does
not depend on pstricks, it seemed to be *incompatible* with pstricks.
This was a deal breaker for me, because I love pstricks and have
douzains of drawings done with it.
I could be proved wrong, but the fact I was told that I had to forego
pstricks and learn a different package (pgf). Since I already had so
much work done in prosper and pstricks, it didn't make sense *to me*
to invest a lot of time and effort on beamer.
It is always good to have choices. If beamer works best for your
needs, that's great. I honestly can't compare beamer to powerdot in
detail, since I had just a brief acquaintance with beamer; but I get
the impression that, overall, they're pretty similar (the pstricks
For me, powerdot allowed me to "upgrade" from prosper with minimal
effort (as I said in another posting, I converted a lot of files in
an automated way) and keep working (now, better than before).
All I can say, then, is that I'm very pleased with powerdot.
------------------------- Info --------------------------
Mac-TeX Website: http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/
& FAQ: http://latex.yauh.de/faq/
TeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq
List Archive: http://tug.org/pipermail/macostex-archives/
More information about the Macostex-archives