[OS X TeX] Which Emacs / XEmacs is recommended?
Peter_Dyballa at Web.DE
Mon Feb 28 21:26:34 CET 2005
Am 28.02.2005 um 20:30 schrieb David Poole:
> I don't want to go to the effort of updating emacs and then have to do
> it immediately again. Is there much customization that needs to be
> done to use all of the latex goodies using this emacs? Or should I
> wait till someone else does it?
AUCTeX does not work correctly because tex-site.el uses the wrong value
This and another variable should be set like this:
Then we have in site-start.el
(setq ispell-program-name "aspell")
but it seems that aspell is unusable -- and I prefer ispell, which
works, so need to comment this line. Then sometimes a Japanese mode
start when I type C-s ... It's not that much, I think.
Can you keep us informed about your daily success?
BTW, GNU Emacs 21.4 isn't such a big progress. It was published in a
haste due to a security problem that was found. It's code base is quite
The Carbonization of the Japanese Carbon Emacs goes quite far in that
it uses anti-aliasing as other Aqua applications and can be made
transparent ... plus some more things I did not discover yet!
--------------------- Info ---------------------
Mac-TeX Website: http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/
& FAQ: http://latex.yauh.de/faq/
TeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq
List Post: <mailto:MacOSX-TeX at email.esm.psu.edu>
More information about the macostex-archives