[OS X TeX] Lobbying for Reply-To as it used to be

Andrew Brown ab at c18.net
Mon Mar 22 13:38:10 CET 2004

Thirded. The present arrangement is inconvenient and makes coherent 
discussion even more difficult than it has to be. -- AB who narrowly 
avoided sending this to Adrian alone and who like him had to fool 
around with the To and Cc fields

Le 22 mars 04, à 12:59, Adrian Heathcote a écrit :

> Seconded. At the time the change was proposed an argument was put 
> forward that the new way was the ``right'' way. I considered 
> responding at the time that I could see nothing right about it. The 
> genuinely right way is to do what the whole list finds 
> convenient---there just is no higher standard for rightness here. The 
> convention had been established that a reply was by default a response 
> to the list---not an individual. The new way is positively 
> inconvenient, and means making a lot of changes in the To and Cc 
> fields if one is trying to prevent the original poster getting it 
> twice.

Please see <http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/> for list
guidelines, information, and LaTeX/TeX resources.

More information about the macostex-archives mailing list