MacOSX-TeX Digest #244 - 02/22/02
TeX on Mac OS X Mailing List
MacOSX-TeX at email.esm.psu.edu
Sat Feb 23 02:00:01 CET 2002
MacOSX-TeX Digest #244 - Friday, February 22, 2002
Bug in latest epstopdf
by "Gerben Wierda" <sherlock at rna.nl>
Re: [Mac OS X TeX] Re: Installing LucidaBright family under Mac OS X?!
by "Adrian Heathcote" <adrian.heathcote at philosophy.usyd.edu.au>
Re: [Mac OS X TeX] Re: Installing LucidaBright family under Mac OS X?!
by "Michael Murray" <mmurray at maths.adelaide.edu.au>
Re: [Mac OS X TeX] Re: Installing LucidaBright family under Mac OS X?!
by "Cyril Niklaus" <cyril.niklaus at bigfoot.com>
Re: [Mac OS X TeX] Re: Installing LucidaBright family under Mac OS X?!
by "Adrian Heathcote" <adrian.heathcote at philosophy.usyd.edu.au>
Re: Trying to get something Alpha-ish in Mac OS X
by "Eric Hsu" <erichsu at math.sfsu.edu>
Small but important update to TeX.dmg
by "Gerben Wierda" <sherlock at rna.nl>
Re: Editors - some questions
by "Joachim Kock" <kock at math.unice.fr>
Re: custom format files?
by "Joachim Kock" <kock at math.unice.fr>
Re: [Mac OS X TeX] Re: Editors - some questions
by "Jan Erik Moström" <lists at mostrom.pp.se>
Re: [Mac OS X TeX] Small but important update to TeX.dmg
by "Gerben Wierda" <sherlock at rna.nl>
Re: [Mac OS X TeX] Editors - some questions
by "Gianguido Dall'Agata" <dallagat at physik.hu-berlin.de>
Re: [Mac OS X TeX] Re: emacs 21.1
by "Piet van Oostrum" <piet at cs.uu.nl>
prosper
by "Michel Durinx" <durinx at rulsfb.leidenuniv.nl>
counting words in TexShop
by <christoph.lehmann at unifr.ch>
Re: [Mac OS X TeX] Editors - some questions
by "Jan Erik Moström" <lists at mostrom.pp.se>
missing ligatures in hard copy
by "William Duckworth" <wmd at iastate.edu>
Re: [Mac OS X TeX] missing ligatures in hard copy
by "Claus Gerhardt" <gerhardt at math.uni-heidelberg.de>
Re: [Mac OS X TeX] missing ligatures in hard copy
by "Claus Gerhardt" <gerhardt at math.uni-heidelberg.de>
[Mac OS X TeX] Re: Trying to get something Alpha-ish in Mac OS X
by "Mark Guzdial" <guzdial at cc.gatech.edu>
Re: [Mac OS X TeX] Re: emacs 21.1
by "Joshua S. Hodas" <hodas at cs.hmc.edu>
xdvi for MacOS X?
by "Mark Guzdial" <guzdial at cc.gatech.edu>
[Mac OS X TeX] Trying to get something Alpha-ish in Mac OS X
by "Steve Harlow" <sjh1 at york.ac.uk>
Re: [Mac OS X TeX] Re: emacs 21.1
by "Mark Guzdial" <guzdial at cc.gatech.edu>
Re: [Mac OS X TeX] Trying to get something Alpha-ish in Mac OS X
by "Joseph C. Slater" <joseph.slater at wright.edu>
Re: [Mac OS X TeX] counting words in TexShop
by "J.Huelsmann" <J.Huelsmann at tu-bs.de>
Re: [Mac OS X TeX] xdvi for MacOS X?
by "Martin Costabel" <costabel at wanadoo.fr>
Re: [Mac OS X TeX] Re: emacs 21.1
by "Piet van Oostrum" <piet at cs.uu.nl>
Re: [Mac OS X TeX] Re: emacs 21.1
by "Enrico Franconi" <franconi at cs.man.ac.uk>
Re: [Mac OS X TeX] counting words in TexShop
by "Rick Zaccone" <zaccone at bucknell.edu>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Bug in latest epstopdf
From: "Gerben Wierda" <sherlock at rna.nl>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 01:05:20 +0100
The latest experimental epstopdf which is part of the current TeX.dmg
contains an ugly bug. I will upload a new TeX.dmg tonight. If you do not
want to download the entire package, it suffices to download
ftp://ftp.nluug.nl/pub/comp/macosx/epstopdf
and (from the directory where it is located, in a Terminal window)
execute
sudo chmod +x epstopdf
sudo cp -p epstopdf `which epstopdf`
The new TeX.dmg will be available in a few hours.
G
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: [Mac OS X TeX] Re: Installing LucidaBright family under Mac OS X?!
From: "Adrian Heathcote" <adrian.heathcote at philosophy.usyd.edu.au>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 12:28:51 +1100
Thanks---this is very useful information. Just one thing though---on the
maccentral discussion boards last night, mention was made of the recent
upgrade (10.1.3) not supporting any fonts made or modified with
fontographer. Moreover a senior Apple spokesman said that this would
*not* be fixed in a later release. Where does this leave those who want
to use Lucida Bright or Minion in TeX?
I have to say that this recent "upgrade" looks like another case of 5
bugs removed, 10 bugs introduced. Gives a new meaning to backward
compatibility.
Adrian Heathcote
On Friday, February 22, 2002, at 04:28 AM, Arthur Ogawa wrote:
> "David M. Wood" wrote:
>
>> I bought [Lucida Bright] several years ago for use under NeXTstep,
>> successfully
>> modified
>> them for use on Linux, but have no idea what Mac OS X expects to be
>> installed?
>
> I am copying this email to the MacOSX-TeX mailing list, where your query
> will find better support than I alone am able to give.
>
> I know for sure that Mac OS X will acccept Type 1 fonts installed in the
> Classic system folder, which is how most of my Mac OS X fonts are now
> (because they are carry-overs from Mac OS Classic). However, things that
> worked for NextStep often continue to work for Mac OS X (you are, of
> course, already familiar with NextStep fonts).
>
> Under Mac OS Classic, a font should be installed into the System
> Folder:Fonts folder in the form of a font suitcase (file type FFIL
> containing FOND and NFNT resourses) plus the PostScript version of the
> font in a file of type LWFN (effectively the contents of the .pfa file
> in POST resources).
>
> You have the fonts in PFA and AFM files. You are looking for
>
> 1. A utility to convert PFA to LWFN. CMacTeX, version 3.6 or later, has
> a pfa2lwfn in its t1utils tool.
>
> 2. A utility to calculate FOND and NFNT resources from the PFA. This is
> the part you are missing.
>
> For the latter, I use the commercial product Fontographer for Power Mac.
> Note that Fontographer generates AFM, LWFN, and FFIL files; you will
> select out only the latter.
>
> Note also that the file name of the LWFN must be coordinated with the
> PostScript font name of the particular font. The name of the LWFN file
> created by Fontographer should be applied to the LWFN file generated by
> pfa2lwfn if the two names are not identical.
>
> Finally, note that when Fontographer opens a font for editing, it
> recalculates the hints, so please do not use a LWFN generated by
> Fontographer itself: you will lose all the beautiful hints calculated by
> Blenda Horn.
>
> Under Mac OS X, there probably is a file format for Type 1 fonts that is
> more modern than the FFIL/LWFN format of Mac OS Classic. Unfortunately,
> I really know little about this; I wish I did. I don't even know if the
> NextStep native format continues to work under Mac OS X.
>
> Also, there is a new standard for fonts, called OpenType, but here again
> my information is not good.
>
> Arthur Ogawa/TeX Consultants
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, send email to <info at email.esm.psu.edu> with
> "unsubscribe macosx-tex" (no quotes) in the body.
> For additional HELP, send email to <info at email.esm.psu.edu> with
> "help" (no quotes) in the body.
> This list is not moderated, and I am not responsible for
> messages posted by third parties.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: [Mac OS X TeX] Re: Installing LucidaBright family under Mac OS X?!
From: "Michael Murray" <mmurray at maths.adelaide.edu.au>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 12:31:46 +1030
>maccentral discussion boards last night, mention was made of the
>recent upgrade (10.1.3) not supporting any fonts made or modified
>with fontographer. Moreover a senior Apple spokesman said that this
>would *not* be fixed in a later release. Where does this leave those
>who want to use Lucida Bright or Minion in TeX?
>Adrian Heathcote
>
Hi Adrian
I am using LucidaBright fonts which I originally bought from YandY for
mac os 9 and then converted to unix form (pfb's ?). CMacTeX
has a lwfn2pfb script.
I just tried these fonts under 10.1.3 and
it all looks OK on preview in TeXShop.
I am not a font expert but if the original person wanted pfb's
and has pfa's couldn't they just use one of Tom Kiffe's tools?
His t1utils has a pfa2pfb option and the script in fact
uses that I think.
I found that there was a bit of messing about to
get the names of the fonts files right but it wasn't
too bad. The abbrevations used by the mac os 9 lwfn fonts
didn't quite match the ones in pfb form.
Michael
--
_________________________________________________________
Assoc/Prof Michael Murray
Department of Pure Mathematics Fax: 61+ 8 8303
3696
University of Adelaide Phone: 61+ 8 8303 4174
Australia 5005 Email: mmurray at maths.adelaide.edu.au
Home Page: http://www.maths.adelaide.edu.au/pure/mmurray
PGP public key:
http://www.maths.adelaide.edu.au/pure/mmurray/pgp.txt
_________________________________________________________
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: [Mac OS X TeX] Re: Installing LucidaBright family under Mac OS X?!
From: "Cyril Niklaus" <cyril.niklaus at bigfoot.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 11:05:50 +0900
On Vendredi, février 22, 2002, at 10:28 , Adrian Heathcote wrote:
> Thanks---this is very useful information. Just one thing though---on
> the maccentral discussion boards last night, mention was made of the
> recent upgrade (10.1.3) not supporting any fonts made or modified with
> fontographer. Moreover a senior Apple spokesman said that this would
> *not* be fixed in a later release.
Well I did not take the time to find this discussion you're mentioning
(could you provide URLs please?), but I rushed to my text editors to
check this.
In my case I can happily say that it is not true: I can use both in
Classic (Nisus) and in OSX (TextEdit, Word) my Fontographer
made/modified fonts.
Cyril
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: [Mac OS X TeX] Re: Installing LucidaBright family under Mac OS X?!
From: "Adrian Heathcote" <adrian.heathcote at philosophy.usyd.edu.au>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 13:28:05 +1100
--Apple-Mail-2--469536662
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=ISO-8859-1;
format=flowed
(could you provide URLs please?),
I'd be very happy if this story turned out to be false, or false enough=20=
not to concern Tex users. Here is the Url
=
http://forums.maccentral.com/wwwthreads/showflat.php?Cat=3D&Board=3Dnews02=
0219osxphp&
=
Number=3D96403&page=3D&view=3Dexpanded&sb=3D5&o=3D&part=3D&returnto=3Dhttp=
://maccentral.
macworld.com/news/0202/19.osx.php
if it fails to work here is how you find it: go to maccentral.com and=20
read the story on the new system release at the top of the page. Scroll=20=
down and you will find in the notice boards a discussion of fonts=20
failing under the new upgrade, in particular Fontographer produced =
fonts.
As Michael Murray suggests, maybe Fontographer is not required for the=20=
adaptation.
I can confirm, however, that I have one conspicuous font problem and=20
another bug related to TexShop display.
Adrian Heathcote
On Friday, February 22, 2002, at 01:05 PM, Cyril Niklaus wrote:
>
> On Vendredi, f=E9vrier 22, 2002, at 10:28 , Adrian Heathcote wrote:
>
>> Thanks---this is very useful information. Just one thing though---on=20=
>> the maccentral discussion boards last night, mention was made of the=20=
>> recent upgrade (10.1.3) not supporting any fonts made or modified =
with=20
>> fontographer. Moreover a senior Apple spokesman said that this would=20=
>> *not* be fixed in a later release.
> Well I did not take the time to find this discussion you're mentioning=20=
> (could you provide URLs please?), but I rushed to my text editors to=20=
> check this.
> In my case I can happily say that it is not true: I can use both in=20
> Classic (Nisus) and in OSX (TextEdit, Word) my Fontographer=20
> made/modified fonts.
>
> Cyril
>
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, send email to <info at email.esm.psu.edu> with
> "unsubscribe macosx-tex" (no quotes) in the body.
> For additional HELP, send email to <info at email.esm.psu.edu> with
> "help" (no quotes) in the body.
> This list is not moderated, and I am not responsible for
> messages posted by third parties.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
--Apple-Mail-2--469536662
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/enriched;
charset=ISO-8859-1
<color><param>0000,0000,DEDE</param>(could you provide URLs please?),
</color>
I'd be very happy if this story turned out to be false, or false
enough not to concern Tex users. Here is the Url
=
http://forums.maccentral.com/wwwthreads/showflat.php?Cat=3D&Board=3Dnews02=
0219osxphp&Number=3D96403&page=3D&view=3Dexpanded&sb=3D5&o=3D&part=3D&retu=
rnto=3Dhttp://maccentral.macworld.com/news/0202/19.osx.php
if it fails to work here is how you find it: go to maccentral.com and
read the story on the new system release at the top of the page.
Scroll down and you will find in the notice boards a discussion of
fonts failing under the new upgrade, in particular Fontographer
produced fonts.
As Michael Murray suggests, maybe Fontographer is not required for the
adaptation.
I can confirm, however, that I have one conspicuous font problem and
another bug related to TexShop display.
Adrian Heathcote
On Friday, February 22, 2002, at 01:05 PM, Cyril Niklaus wrote:
<excerpt>
On Vendredi, f=E9vrier 22, 2002, at 10:28 , Adrian Heathcote wrote:
<excerpt>Thanks---this is very useful information. Just one thing
though---on the maccentral discussion boards last night, mention was
made of the recent upgrade (10.1.3) not supporting any fonts made or
modified with fontographer. Moreover a senior Apple spokesman said
that this would *not* be fixed in a later release.
</excerpt>Well I did not take the time to find this discussion you're
mentioning (could you provide URLs please?), but I rushed to my text
editors to check this.
In my case I can happily say that it is not true: I can use both in
Classic (Nisus) and in OSX (TextEdit, Word) my Fontographer
made/modified fonts.
Cyril
-----------------------------------------------------------------
To UNSUBSCRIBE, send email to <<info at email.esm.psu.edu> with
"unsubscribe macosx-tex" (no quotes) in the body.
For additional HELP, send email to <<info at email.esm.psu.edu> with
"help" (no quotes) in the body.
This list is not moderated, and I am not responsible for
messages posted by third parties.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
</excerpt>=
--Apple-Mail-2--469536662--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: Trying to get something Alpha-ish in Mac OS X
From: "Eric Hsu" <erichsu at math.sfsu.edu>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 19:43:35 -0800
Hi folks,
Excellent banter about pros and cons of editors. It's nice to hear
reports from editor advocates. Random notes:
(1) My recollection of changing line endings in Alpha7 was that it
was in theory just a popup, but I recall some peculiar troubles I had
with mixed line-ending files, something to the effect of the popup
change not changing all line endings. The font thing I remember with
more annoyance. I agree that it was doable ( I did do it!), but I
always found it unintuitive and lost among the many config options
that seem to terrify newcomers to Alpha.
(2) This was a clever post from Martin Costabel:
> > Let me know if you find something even better! (I'm not learning
> > Emacs... sorry.)
>
>You ask a question and say immediately that you don't want to hear the
>answer. Can't be helped, I guess.
Can someone comment on some specific advantages Emacs gives you for
editing Perl/TeX/HTML? Even better would be someone who switched
from BBEdit/Alpha/Pepper to XEmacs or Emacs. Mark Guzdial seems to
have gotten Emacs religion... perhaps he can elaborate on what new
features he's enjoying...
I have personally found the initial learning curve of Emacs to be too
high. And this is from someone who taught himself vi, C, 6502 and
68000 assembly language! I have some psychological block because it
takes so long to learn to do elementary operations (and throw in old
bad Telnets that choked on important control characters to make it
worse). But I'd be willing to go there if there was a bright light
at the end of the tunnel.
(3) Someone asked about indenting. Pepper indents text just fine
(e.g. \item lists). I do miss Alpha's tabs re-wrapping text... when
it worked, it was beautiful.
Also, Peter Erwin made a list of cool Alpha features. To add to his
chart, Pepper can be configured to launch OzTeX (and I believe other
TeXs) with Cmd-T. Rectangular selections work fine. In theory it can
mark files, but I haven't quite gotten the hang of it yet.
- Eric
ps. Hi Mark G! We met at CSCL in Michigan...
--
Eric Hsu, Assistant Professor of Mathematics
San Francisco State University
erichsu at math.sfsu.edu
http://math.sfsu.edu/hsu/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Small but important update to TeX.dmg
From: "Gerben Wierda" <sherlock at rna.nl>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 09:51:22 +0100
epstopdf of the Feb 19 build contained a bug. This has been fixed.
Current download (they're all the same)
ftp://ftp.nluug.nl/pub/comp/macosx/tex-gs/TeX.dmg
ftp://ftp.nluug.nl/pub/comp/macosx/tex-
gs/TeXLive-20020219-teTeX-texmf-beta-20020129-2002-02-22-01-00-53.dmg
ftp://ftp.nluug.nl/pub/comp/macosx/tex-
gs/TeXLive-20020219-teTeX-texmf-beta-20020129.dmg
ftp://ftp.nluug.nl/pub/comp/macosx/tex-gs/TeXLive-teTeX.dmg
If you currently are using the previous TeX.dmg (build
2002-02-19-16-34-23) you can also just download
ftp://ftp.nluug.nl/pub/comp/macosx/epstopdf
and in a Terminal window from where you have downloaded epstopdf execute:
sudo chmod +x epstopdf
sudo cp -p epstopdf `which epstopdf`
G
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: Editors - some questions
From: "Joachim Kock" <kock at math.unice.fr>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 10:10:56 +0100
Hello,
The question of editors seems to be mostly a question of religion or mother
tongue --- it's hard to change! Also comparison is difficulted by the fact
that few people are completely familiar with more than one editor --- and
with the more advanced editors like alpha and emacs you might say that
few people are completely familiar with them at all! It is certainly true
that these two editors are too complicated for many users, especially for
those who spend less than half an hour a day in their editor, since you
have to invest some time in adapting your habits, forcing yourself to use
some fancy features, even if in the beginning it would be quicker to do it
the SimpleText way. I suppose it's a bit like taking the step from qwerty
to dvorak, or like learning to type without looking at the keyboard.
The first step from SimpleText to a text editor is often taken in the need
of a latex menu. It is so convenient to choose a latex environment from a
menu instead of looking it up in the latex companion. It seems that all
the editors mentionned on this mailing list have some sort of latex menu,
although there are probably differences in how smart they are about
inserting the templates. Next step is that you learn the keyboard
equivalents, to avoid mousing around while you are typing. Once you
get used to keyboard equivalents, you are confirmed in your religion...
Here the differences between the various editors begin: their
configurability... Every common action should have a keyboard equivalent,
so you need to bind your own keys, and take control over the combinations.
At this point the latex aspects of your religion becomes less important as
you start to realise the power of editing commands, navigation, scripting,
communication with other programmes, and the editor becomes equally
impoartant for HTML, emails, file conversion...
Not everything can be offered out of the box, so the important thing is
that the editor be configurable. The deeper advantage of alpha and emacs
(and others, perhaps) is that they have an extension language, so you can
go in and finetune the behaviour of the functions and write your own little
scripts. To start with, it is a bit frightening to look into those tcl or
lisp libraries, but it was also frightening the first time you looked into
a latex source file! Very soon you get the feeling, skip through a lot of
incomprehensible code, detect the spot where it says
insertText "\\section\{**\}\r**"
and then you just replace this line by
insertText "%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\r\\section\{**\}\r%%%%%%%%%%%%\r**"
and hopla! every time you invoke that function you will have such %-tags
inserted to make the latex source more readable. (Stupid example of course
--- but this is not the alphatcl mailing list.)
Enrico wrote
> emacs-20.7 is available from fink precompiled through dselect: this
> means that dselect downloads and installs automatically the MacOSX
> binary package. To have all the LaTeX menus and functionalities in
> emacs (far superior to those of Alpha and friends), you need to load
> from emacs the macros: auctex (and its font-latex and bib-cite modes)
Alpha has certainly learned a lot from emacs over the years, and hopefully
this will continue. It would be very helpful (for the alpha community,
anyway) to hear exactly which features emacs/auctex has that alpha doesn't.
If those features are cool, there is a fair chance that somebody on the
alphatcl mailing list will implement them! (I will do so myself if it is
within my limited tcl capacities...)
Sorry for being long --- I promise my next mail will be short.
Joachim.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Joachim KOCK
Laboratoire de Mathématiques J.A.Dieudonné Tél. +33 04.92.07.62.40
Université de Nice Sophia-Antipolis Fax +33 04.93.51.79.74
Parc Valrose - 06108 Nice cédex 2 - FRANCE Mél. kock at math.unice.fr
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: custom format files?
From: "Joachim Kock" <kock at math.unice.fr>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 10:24:59 +0100
Gerben wrote:
>make that -progname=pdftex
Thanks, it works. Thanks a lot indeed for your support.
So for the record: in order to use a custom format under TeXLive
(called hiptex, say) based on pdflatex, create an executable
'hiptex' containing these three lines
> #!/bin/sh
> test -f "`kpsewhich hiptex.fmt`" || fmtutil --byfmt hiptex
> exec pdftex -fmt=hiptex -progname=pdftex ${1+"$@"}
and put it in ~/bin/
The format file 'hiptex.fmt' itself should be in ~/Library/texmf/web2c/
Best,
Joachim.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: [Mac OS X TeX] Re: Editors - some questions
From: "Jan Erik Moström" <lists at mostrom.pp.se>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 10:50:20 +0100
At 2002-02-22 10:10, Joachim Kock <kock at math.unice.fr> wrote:
>The question of editors seems to be mostly a question of religion or mother
>tongue --- it's hard to change!
I sure agree to that
>erything can be offered out of the box, so the important thing is
>that the editor be configurable.
Agree here also
>Alpha has certainly learned a lot from emacs over the years, and hopefully
>this will continue. It would be very helpful (for the alpha community,
>anyway) to hear exactly which features emacs/auctex has that alpha doesn't.
>If those features are cool, there is a fair chance that somebody on the
>alphatcl mailing list will implement them! (I will do so myself if it is
>within my limited tcl capacities...)
Yes this is what I'm interested in, what am I as BBEdit user missing because
so far I think I can implement most of it using BBEdit and
AppleScript/Perl/shell programming (which is how you customize BBEdit).
But I get the feeling I'm missing some really cool features that other
editors have ...
jem
--
Jan Erik Moström jem at mostrom.pp.se www.mostrom.pp.se
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: [Mac OS X TeX] Small but important update to TeX.dmg
From: "Gerben Wierda" <sherlock at rna.nl>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 11:02:11 +0100
> Current download (they're all the same)
>
> ftp://ftp.nluug.nl/pub/comp/macosx/tex-gs/TeX.dmg
> ftp://ftp.nluug.nl/pub/comp/macosx/tex-
> gs/TeXLive-20020219-teTeX-texmf-beta-20020129-2002-02-22-01-00-53.dmg
> ftp://ftp.nluug.nl/pub/comp/macosx/tex-
> gs/TeXLive-20020219-teTeX-texmf-beta-20020129.dmg
> ftp://ftp.nluug.nl/pub/comp/macosx/tex-gs/TeXLive-teTeX.dmg
The long names do not work when you download/copy them to HFS+. I will
change my naming scheme in the future to reflect the name limit size on
HFS+
For the moment, just use the first or last one of that list.
G
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: [Mac OS X TeX] Editors - some questions
From: "Gianguido Dall'Agata" <dallagat at physik.hu-berlin.de>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 12:55:12 +0100
>> many of you says Alpha is so good for LaTeX editing but I have to
>> admit that
>> I don't see what makes Alpha so much better than BBEdit.
>>
>> The same goes for Peppar etc.
>>
>> So, could someone explain to me what I "missing" when I use BBEdit?
>> (perhaps
>> there is something I didn't know I needed 8-)
Is the following implemented in BBEdit?
[] ctrl-Tab completion of \ref or \cite with the appropriate label .
I find it extremely useful!
Gianguido
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: [Mac OS X TeX] Re: emacs 21.1
From: "Piet van Oostrum" <piet at cs.uu.nl>
Date: 22 Feb 2002 12:55:56 +0100
>>>>> Thierry Ramond <thierry.ramond at math.u-psud.fr> (TR) writes:
TR> The "Aqua" version of Emacs 21.1 can be found at
TR> http://www.versiontracker.com/macosx/
TR> Many thanks to Piet van Oostrum for his help. I have edited his file
TR> ~/.MacOSX/environment.plist
TR> and even if I don't understand the langage I have written, it works very
TR> well now.
TR> I have two more questions ( sorry if they are more or less off-topic here):
TR> - Where is this kind of Unix stuff documented by Apple?
I don't know. I just found a message to this effect somewhere on the net.
TR> - How to install auctex for this Aqua version of Emacs?
You have to put the files in /usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp.
In fact I have used the make/make install from the distribution and it
puts it in /usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp/auctex.
/usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp should contain subdirs.el for this to work
out of the box. I don't know if porkrinds distribution has it. I did the
compilation myself (and also made an installer package out of it), but if I
remember correctly I had to copy the subdirs.el file myself.
Then you will have to customize tex-site.el.
--
Piet van Oostrum <piet at cs.uu.nl>
URL: http://www.cs.uu.nl/~piet [PGP]
Private email: P.van.Oostrum at hccnet.nl
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: prosper
From: "Michel Durinx" <durinx at rulsfb.leidenuniv.nl>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 13:18:43 +0100
1. I never got prosper to work with OzTeX under OS 9
2. However, it worked perfectly from day one under OS X with
teTeX/texshop, and I really like the ease + result.
[ Only choose the 'dvips + ghostscript' option every time you open the
file. Why does a file not remember which option it prefers?]
Michel
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: counting words in TexShop
From: <christoph.lehmann at unifr.ch>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 13:26:47 +0100
is there any good tool, running under os x? what would you recommend?
christoph lehmann
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: [Mac OS X TeX] Editors - some questions
From: "Jan Erik Moström" <lists at mostrom.pp.se>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 14:11:44 +0100
At 2002-02-22 12:55, Gianguido Dall'Agata <dallagat at physik.hu-berlin.de>
wrote:
>Is the following implemented in BBEdit?
>
>[] ctrl-Tab completion of \ref or \cite with the appropriate label .
Not that I know of ... but how can the editor know which label is the correct
one? Or do you get a list of all labels or does the editor keeps track of the
labels and does it best to find a match and let you choose when it can't find
a unique match (like command completion in tcsh for example).
Does it keep track of labels in multi-file documents?
jem
--
Jan Erik Moström jem at mostrom.pp.se www.mostrom.pp.se
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: missing ligatures in hard copy
From: "William Duckworth" <wmd at iastate.edu>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 09:35:44 -0600
I'm experimenting with ps2pdf as a replacement for Distiller. I'm
using the ps2pdf that comes with Gerben's TeX.dmg. On screen, the pdf
looks great (using CMPS fonts). However, when I print it, fi
ligatures are missing and $\mu$ is missing. Using Distiller5 on the
same ps file gives a pdf that looks and prints fine.
The ps file was created using OzTeX for tex-ing and dvips-ing.
Any help would be greatly appreciated. I'd love to be rid of
Distiller (slow and still not Carbon not to mention expensive).
--
===================================================================
Dr. William Duckworth II email: wmd at iastate.edu
326 Snedecor Hall phone: 515-294-7766
Iowa State University fax: 515-294-4040
Statistical Laboratory and Spring 2002 office hours:
Department of Statistics M 9a, W 3p, R 8:30a, F 1p
Ames, IA 50011-1210 http://www.public.iastate.edu/~wmd/
===================================================================
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: [Mac OS X TeX] missing ligatures in hard copy
From: "Claus Gerhardt" <gerhardt at math.uni-heidelberg.de>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 17:06:56 +0100
--============_-1197728447==_ma============
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" ; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>I'm experimenting with ps2pdf as a replacement for Distiller. I'm
>using the ps2pdf that comes with Gerben's TeX.dmg. On screen, the
>pdf looks great (using CMPS fonts). However, when I print it, fi
>ligatures are missing and $\mu$ is missing. Using Distiller5 on the
>same ps file gives a pdf that looks and prints fine.
>
>The ps file was created using OzTeX for tex-ing and dvips-ing.
>
>Any help would be greatly appreciated. I'd love to be rid of
>Distiller (slow and still not Carbon not to mention expensive).
I recommend to use first the command
dvips -Ppdf file.dvi
and then
ps2pdf13 file.ps
I have written a small shell script that combines both actions and
removes the .ps file
#!/bin/sh
##
# dvipdfc.sh
# Convert dvi files to pdf files
#
#
#
##
for file; do
location=3D$(dirname "$file")
cd "${location}" && dvips -q -o "${file}.ps" -Ppdf "${file}" &&
ps2pdf13 -sPAPERSIZE=3Da4 -r1200 "${file}.ps" && rm "${file}.ps"
done
Save it as a text file dvipdfc.sh. One can invoke it with the command
sh dvipdfc.sh filename %%use filename without the suffix .dvi
To make an executable save the file in ~/bin and issue the command
chmod ogu+x ~/bin/dvipdfc
Then, after restarting the terminal,
dvipdfc filename %% without any suffix
will do the job.
Claus
--
Claus Gerhardt
Institut f=FCr Angewandte Mathematik
Ruprecht-Karls-Universit=E4t Heidelberg
Im Neuenheimer Feld 294
69120 Heidelberg
Germany
Homepage: http://www.math.uni-heidelberg.de/studinfo/gerhardt/
--============_-1197728447==_ma============
Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!doctype html public "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<html><head><style type=3D"text/css"><!--
blockquote, dl, ul, ol, li { padding-top: 0 ; padding-bottom: 0 }
--></style><title>Re: [Mac OS X TeX] missing ligatures in hard
copy</title></head><body>
<blockquote type=3D"cite" cite>I'm experimenting with ps2pdf as a
replacement for Distiller. I'm using the ps2pdf that comes with
Gerben's TeX.dmg. On screen, the pdf looks great (using CMPS fonts).
However, when I print it, fi ligatures are missing and $\mu$ is
missing. Using Distiller5 on the same ps file gives a pdf that looks
and prints fine.<br>
<br>
The ps file was created using OzTeX for tex-ing and dvips-ing.<br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type=3D"cite" cite>Any help would be greatly appreciated.
I'd love to be rid of Distiller (slow and still not Carbon not to
mention expensive).</blockquote>
<div><br></div>
<div>I recommend to use first the command</div>
<div> dvips -Ppdf file.dvi</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>and then</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>ps2pdf13 file.ps</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>I have written a small shell script that combines both actions
and removes the .ps file</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>#!/bin/sh<br>
##<br>
# dvipdfc.sh<br>
# Convert dvi files to pdf files<br>
#</div>
<div>#</div>
<div>#</div>
<div>##<br>
</div>
<div><br>
for file; do<br>
location=3D$(dirname "$file")<br>
cd "${location}" && dvips -q -o
"${file}.ps" -Ppdf "${file}" && ps2pdf13
-sPAPERSIZE=3Da4 -r1200 "${file}.ps" && rm
"${file}.ps"<br>
done<br>
</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>Save it as a text file dvipdfc.sh. One can invoke it with the
command</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>sh dvipdfc.sh filename %%use filename without the suffix
=2Edvi</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>To make an executable save the file in ~/bin and issue the
command</div>
<div><br></div>
<div><font face=3D"Verdana" size=3D"-6" color=3D"#000000">chmod ogu+x
~/bin/dvipdfc</font></div>
<div><br></div>
<div><br></div>
<div>Then, after restarting the terminal,</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>dvipdfc filename %% without any suffix</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>will do the job.</div>
<div><br></div>
<div><br></div>
<div>Claus</div>
<x-sigsep><pre>--
</pre></x-sigsep>
<div><br>
<br>
Claus Gerhardt<br>
Institut f=FCr Angewandte Mathematik<br>
Ruprecht-Karls-Universit=E4t Heidelberg<br>
Im Neuenheimer Feld 294<br>
69120 Heidelberg<br>
Germany<br>
<br>
Homepage: http://www.math.uni-heidelberg.de/studinfo/gerhardt/</div>
</body>
</html>
--============_-1197728447==_ma============--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: [Mac OS X TeX] missing ligatures in hard copy
From: "Claus Gerhardt" <gerhardt at math.uni-heidelberg.de>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 17:24:39 +0100
--============_-1197727391==_ma============
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" ; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
I forgot to indicate the non trivial linebreaks ([linebreak]) in the
shell script if they don't fit it won't work.
#!/bin/sh
##
# dvipdfc.sh
# Convert dvi files to pdf files
#
#
#
##
for file; do [linebreak]
location=3D$(dirname "$file") [linebreak]
cd "${location}" && dvips -q -o "${file}.ps" -Ppdf "${file}" &&
ps2pdf13 -sPAPERSIZE=3Da4 -r1200 "${file}.ps" && rm "${file}.ps"
[linebreak]
done [linebreak]
Save it as a text file dvipdfc.sh. One can invoke it with the command
sh dvipdfc.sh filename %%use filename without the suffix .dvi
To make an executable save the file in ~/bin and issue the command
chmod ogu+x ~/bin/dvipdfc
Then, after restarting the terminal,
dvipdfc filename %% without any suffix
will do the job.
Claus
--
Claus Gerhardt
Institut f=FCr Angewandte Mathematik
Ruprecht-Karls-Universit=E4t Heidelberg
Im Neuenheimer Feld 294
69120 Heidelberg
Germany
Homepage: http://www.math.uni-heidelberg.de/studinfo/gerhardt/
--============_-1197727391==_ma============
Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!doctype html public "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<html><head><style type=3D"text/css"><!--
blockquote, dl, ul, ol, li { padding-top: 0 ; padding-bottom: 0 }
--></style><title>Re: [Mac OS X TeX] missing ligatures in hard
copy</title></head><body>
<blockquote type=3D"cite" cite><br></blockquote>
<div><br></div>
<div><br></div>
<div>I forgot to indicate the non trivial linebreaks ([linebreak]) in
the shell script if they don't fit it won't work.</div>
<div><br></div>
<div><br></div>
<div>#!/bin/sh<br>
##<br>
# dvipdfc.sh<br>
# Convert dvi files to pdf files<br>
#</div>
<div>#</div>
<div>#</div>
<div>##<br>
</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>for file; do [linebreak]</div>
<div> location=3D$(dirname "$file") [linebreak]<br>
cd "${location}" && dvips -q -o
"${file}.ps" -Ppdf "${file}" && ps2pdf13
-sPAPERSIZE=3Da4 -r1200 "${file}.ps" && rm
"${file}.ps" [linebreak]<br>
done [linebreak]<br>
</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>Save it as a text file dvipdfc.sh. One can invoke it with the
command</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>sh dvipdfc.sh filename %%use filename without the suffix
=2Edvi</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>To make an executable save the file in ~/bin and issue the
command</div>
<div><br></div>
<div><font face=3D"Verdana" color=3D"#000000">chmod ogu+x
~/bin/dvipdfc</font></div>
<div><br></div>
<div><br></div>
<div>Then, after restarting the terminal,</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>dvipdfc filename %% without any suffix</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>will do the job.</div>
<div><br></div>
<div><br></div>
<div>Claus</div>
<x-sigsep><pre>--
</pre></x-sigsep>
<div><br>
<br>
Claus Gerhardt<br>
Institut f=FCr Angewandte Mathematik<br>
Ruprecht-Karls-Universit=E4t Heidelberg<br>
Im Neuenheimer Feld 294<br>
69120 Heidelberg<br>
Germany<br>
<br>
Homepage: http://www.math.uni-heidelberg.de/studinfo/gerhardt/</div>
</body>
</html>
--============_-1197727391==_ma============--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: [Mac OS X TeX] Re: Trying to get something Alpha-ish in Mac OS X
From: "Mark Guzdial" <guzdial at cc.gatech.edu>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 11:37:21 -0500
Hi Eric!
I don't know if I've got the religion yet: I still haven't WRITTEN
anything with Xemacs! And it's certainly a pain to install. But
some of the things I like so far:
- Reftex's awareness of labels
- The TOC view of section headings from Reftex (even nicer than Alpha's)
- AucTeX's menus of commonly used phrases (which I missed from Alpha)
More as I get to know the system better -- there are LONG menus of
stuff there that I haven't played with yet...
Mark
--
--------------------------
Mark Guzdial : Georgia Tech : College of Computing : Atlanta, GA 30332-0280
Associate Professor - Learning Sciences & Technologies.
Collaborative Software Lab - http://coweb.cc.gatech.edu/csl/
(404) 894-5618 : Fax (404) 894-0673 : guzdial at cc.gatech.edu
http://www.cc.gatech.edu/gvu/people/Faculty/Mark.Guzdial.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: [Mac OS X TeX] Re: emacs 21.1
From: "Joshua S. Hodas" <hodas at cs.hmc.edu>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 08:51:17 -0800
At 12:55 PM +0100 2/22/02, Piet van Oostrum wrote:
> >>>>> Thierry Ramond <thierry.ramond at math.u-psud.fr> (TR) writes:
>
>TR> The "Aqua" version of Emacs 21.1 can be found at
>TR> http://www.versiontracker.com/macosx/
Just downloaded this and it is great. But it lacks one feature I can
not do without, drag and drop of files to be edited.
It is funny, when I am in a terminal window, I see nothing wrong with
typing a path to emacs (either in the command line or at ^x^f). But
when I am working in teh Aqua/Finder side of things it just seems
utterly anathema.
I would guess it should possible to write a little desktop
applescript that you could drop files onto which would then send the
appropriate commands to emacs to open the files via the
applescript/unix integration, but I have not had time to look at such
stuff.
Anyone want to volunteer to put such together, or have a better idea?
Josh
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Josh Hodas / Associate Professor Office Phone: (909) 621-8650
Director, Computer Science Clinic Clinic Sec'y: (909) 607-8379
Computer Science / Harvey Mudd College Home Phone: (909) 625-1179
1250 North Dartmouth Avenue E-Mail: hodas at cs.hmc.edu
Claremont, CA 91711 WWW : http://www.cs.hmc.edu/~hodas/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: xdvi for MacOS X?
From: "Mark Guzdial" <guzdial at cc.gatech.edu>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 11:41:48 -0500
Does anyone have xdvi running in MacOS X? I see that it's part of
teTeX (according to the TETEXDOC.pdf in Gerben's TeX.dmg
distribution), but I'm not finding it. I'd like to be able to use it
from XEmacs. I've tried to install it via fink, but it wants to
reinstall teTeX again, which I'd rather not do.
Thanks!
Mark
--
--------------------------
Mark Guzdial : Georgia Tech : College of Computing : Atlanta, GA 30332-0280
Associate Professor - Learning Sciences & Technologies.
Collaborative Software Lab - http://coweb.cc.gatech.edu/csl/
(404) 894-5618 : Fax (404) 894-0673 : guzdial at cc.gatech.edu
http://www.cc.gatech.edu/gvu/people/Faculty/Mark.Guzdial.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: [Mac OS X TeX] Trying to get something Alpha-ish in Mac OS X
From: "Steve Harlow" <sjh1 at york.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 17:46:44 +0000
>Subject: Re: [Mac OS X TeX] Trying to get something Alpha-ish in Mac OS X
>From: "Mark Guzdial" <guzdial at cc.gatech.edu>
>Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 14:48:10 -0500
[snip]
>As it stands right now, I have XFree86, Oroborus, and XEmacs running
>on my machine. It took a bit of hunting to figure out how to install
>AucTeX. It installed fine from the xemacs "sumo" package, but I
>didn't realize that you have to do a bit more to turn it on. Right
>now, I'm STUNNED with how much XEmacs does for you with AucTeX and
>RefTex! It's lots of fun to play with.
Could you say something about what you did to get AucTeX to work? I
failed completely!
-Steve
--
SJ Harlow
Department of Language & Linguistic Science, University of York
Heslington, York YO1 5DD, UK
Phone:+44 1904 432654 Messages:+44 1904 432650 Fax:+44 1904 432673
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: [Mac OS X TeX] Re: emacs 21.1
From: "Mark Guzdial" <guzdial at cc.gatech.edu>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 13:42:51 -0500
What drove me to give up on emacs 21.1 and move to Xemacs is the
still extant bug in Aqua Emacs that shell commands (like executing
latex) don't work because the PATH variable isn't set correctly. I'm
sure it'll get fixed eventually. And when it does, I may go back to
Aqua Emacs because I do prefer its look to Xemacs.
Mark
--
--------------------------
Mark Guzdial : Georgia Tech : College of Computing : Atlanta, GA 30332-0280
Associate Professor - Learning Sciences & Technologies.
Collaborative Software Lab - http://coweb.cc.gatech.edu/csl/
(404) 894-5618 : Fax (404) 894-0673 : guzdial at cc.gatech.edu
http://www.cc.gatech.edu/gvu/people/Faculty/Mark.Guzdial.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: [Mac OS X TeX] Trying to get something Alpha-ish in Mac OS X
From: "Joseph C. Slater" <joseph.slater at wright.edu>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 13:52:52 -0500
How about AlphaTK? I just ran it in Aqua yesterday. It's real close to
working well (I haven't had a chance to really test it).
Joe
__________________________________________________
Joseph C. Slater, PhD
Associate Professor
Dept. of Mechanical and Materials Engg, Wright State University,
3640 Colonel Glenn Highway, Dayton, OH 45435
Phone: 937-775-5040, Fax: 937-775-5009,
http://www.engineering.wright.edu/~jslater
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: [Mac OS X TeX] counting words in TexShop
From: "J.Huelsmann" <J.Huelsmann at tu-bs.de>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 19:41:58 +0100
<!doctype html public "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<html><head><style type="text/css"><!--
blockquote, dl, ul, ol, li { padding-top: 0 ; padding-bottom: 0 }
--></style><title>Re: [Mac OS X TeX] counting words in
TexShop</title></head><body>
<blockquote type="cite" cite>is there any good tool, running under os
x? what would you recommend?</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite>christoph lehmann</blockquote>
<div><br></div>
<div>Hm, there is a little Cocoa-App to do this. The name is
Concorder, the author is<font color="#000000"> Matt Fahrenbacher
(fahrenba at uiuc.edu), look at
www.students.uiuc.edu/~fahrenba/computers/</font></div>
<div><font color="#000000">I think you can also find it at
www.versiontracker.com</font></div>
<div><font color="#000000">--Jan--</font></div>
</body>
</html>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: [Mac OS X TeX] xdvi for MacOS X?
From: "Martin Costabel" <costabel at wanadoo.fr>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 20:44:26 +0100
Mark Guzdial wrote:
>
> Does anyone have xdvi running in MacOS X? I see that it's part of
> teTeX (according to the TETEXDOC.pdf in Gerben's TeX.dmg
> distribution), but I'm not finding it. I'd like to be able to use it
> from XEmacs. I've tried to install it via fink, but it wants to
> reinstall teTeX again, which I'd rather not do.
Fink doesn't want to reinstall tetex again, it just wants to be sure
that you have tetex installed and that xdvi can find it. You can choose
the system-tetex package which doesn't install anything apart from some
symbolic links.
--
Martin
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: [Mac OS X TeX] Re: emacs 21.1
From: "Piet van Oostrum" <piet at cs.uu.nl>
Date: 22 Feb 2002 22:45:39 +0100
>>>>> Mark Guzdial <guzdial at cc.gatech.edu> (MG) writes:
MG> What drove me to give up on emacs 21.1 and move to Xemacs is the still
MG> extant bug in Aqua Emacs that shell commands (like executing latex) don't
MG> work because the PATH variable isn't set correctly. I'm sure it'll get
MG> fixed eventually. And when it does, I may go back to Aqua Emacs because I
MG> do prefer its look to Xemacs.
That's the easiests problem to solve. See my previous posting on the
.MacOSX/environment.plist
One thing that bothers me but doesn't stop me from using emacs is that is
hangs quite often. E.g. when I open a new .tex file with auctex, it prompts
for a master file, and then it hangs.
--
Piet van Oostrum <piet at cs.uu.nl>
URL: http://www.cs.uu.nl/~piet [PGP]
Private email: P.van.Oostrum at hccnet.nl
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: [Mac OS X TeX] Re: emacs 21.1
From: "Enrico Franconi" <franconi at cs.man.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 23:36:25 +0000
On February 22, Piet van Oostrum writes:
> MG> What drove me to give up on emacs 21.1 and move to Xemacs is the
> MG> still extant bug in Aqua Emacs that shell commands (like
> MG> executing latex) don't work because the PATH variable isn't set
> MG> correctly. I'm sure it'll get fixed eventually.
>
> That's the easiests problem to solve. See my previous posting on the
> .MacOSX/environment.plist
It's even easier than that: just put (shell-command "tcsh")
at the beginning of your .emacs file.
> One thing that bothers me but doesn't stop me from using emacs is
> that is hangs quite often. E.g. when I open a new .tex file with
> auctex, it prompts for a master file, and then it hangs.
You probably have a wrong configuration, since it does not happen with
me.
I have just finished a nice Applescript wrap around emacs 21 on Aqua
which allows for drag-and-drop of files to open them, automatic
loading of all the useful utilities for LaTeX and various stuff. I
plan to have an installer with all the auctex/latex files and the
wrapper file soon. I'm travelling this week so be patient.
cheers
-- e.
Enrico Franconi - franconi at cs.man.ac.uk
University of Manchester - http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~franconi/
Department of Computer Science - Phone: +44 (161) 275 6170
Manchester M13 9PL, UK - Fax: +44 (161) 275 6204
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: [Mac OS X TeX] counting words in TexShop
From: "Rick Zaccone" <zaccone at bucknell.edu>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 19:56:03 -0500 (EST)
>is there any good tool, running under os x? what would you recommend?
>christoph lehmann
Excalibur will do this.
http://www.eg.bucknell.edu/~excalibr/
Rick
----------------------------------------------------------------------
End of MacOSX-TeX Digest
-----------------------------------------------------------------
To UNSUBSCRIBE, send email to <info at email.esm.psu.edu> with
"unsubscribe macosx-tex" (no quotes) in the body.
For additional HELP, send email to <info at email.esm.psu.edu> with
"help" (no quotes) in the body.
This list is not moderated, and I am not responsible for
messages posted by third parties.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the macostex-archives
mailing list