<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div><div class="h5">
<br>
</div></div>Well, I don't think fixing bugs in my *head* is that easy.<br></blockquote><div><br>I did not mean that you fix that in your head, but that needs to get fixed in the package.<br> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im"><br>
<br>
</div>I still have a very valid reasons for my ill doings, I want to keep<br>
things as simple as it can, and make sharing code between rtl and ltr<br>
documents more easy, so I simply consider right and left here as<br>
misnomers of start and end, this makes it more logical. If I were to<br>
write a tabular package myself, I would then use the neutral start/end<br>
nomenclature.<br></blockquote><div><br><br>We are not talking about "me" here. If we were so, things would be heaps easier.<br> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im"><br>
<br>
<br>
</div>To me, swapping the meaning of r and l is a misfeature (like the<br>
automatic footnote thing that I never seen in a real world book;<br>
footnotes in Arabic books are aligned to right no mutter what the actual<br>
footnote text it.)<br>
<br clear="all"></blockquote><div><br>I have seen a lot of the textbooks with automatic footnoterule. I am talking about academic typography and academic textbooks not about a novel. In Persian RTL typography, autofootnoterule is a must.<br>
</div></div><br>-- <br>Best wishes,<br>Vafa Khalighi<br>
</div>