[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

*To*: "Nelson H. F. Beebe" <beebe@math.utah.edu>*Subject*: Re: Unicode available/planned for (La)TeX(3)?*From*: Chris Rowley <C.A.Rowley@open.ac.uk>*Date*: Thu, 25 Feb 1999 16:51:42 +0000 (GMT)*Cc*: Eric Maryniak <e.maryniak@pobox.com>, tex-fonts@math.utah.edu*In-Reply-To*: <CMM.0.91.0.919953451.beebe@plot79.math.utah.edu>*References*: <CMM.0.91.0.919953451.beebe@plot79.math.utah.edu>

Nelson H. F. Beebe wrote -- > Eric Maryniak <e.maryniak@pobox.com> asks: > > >> Q: is there a (La)TeX variant, style, documentclass option, ...?, where you > >> can use Unicode? > > This isn't the appropriate list for Unicode and LaTeX questions. That depends on whether you think that Unicode should be connected to fonts. In fact, this particular point is not related to fonts so this is true. But neither is it related only to omega since this is not asking for anything to use 16-bit encoded (anyhow) characters, it is only asking for the support of some TeX syntax, such as \u{20AC}, which allows one to input a character known by its unicode number. It may be sensible and feasible for LaTeX to provide some support for this at some stage. Chris Rowley --- On behalf of the LaTeX3 Project Team

**References**:**Re: Unicode available/planned for (La)TeX(3)?***From:*"Nelson H. F. Beebe" <beebe@math.utah.edu>

**Re: Unicode available/planned for (La)TeX(3)?***From:*"Nelson H. F. Beebe" <beebe@math.utah.edu>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: Q: Unicode available/planned for (La)TeX(3)?** - Next by Date:
**Re: Q: Unicode available/planned for (La)TeX(3)?** - Prev by thread:
**Re: Unicode available/planned for (La)TeX(3)?** - Next by thread:
**Q: Unicode available/planned for (La)TeX(3)?** - Index(es):