[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Misplaced code
- To: email@example.com
- Subject: Re: Misplaced code
- From: Thierry Bouche <Thierry.Bouche@ujf-grenoble.fr>
- Date: Thu, 26 Nov 1998 09:26:15 +0100 (MET)
- Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org
- In-Reply-To: <365C96A3.email@example.com>
» > (\char0 was usually OK).
» I believe it is best when one can define the boundarychar by defining
» which character is to be used for it, independent of its special
» position in the encoding in question. Therefore no code position but a
» character name.
yes, i was implicitly T1, so \char0 is the grave accent--I always
thought that lonely accents should be good candidates for
boudarychars, but this is maybe short-minded (as some conventions put
accents on capital letters not over but beside the capital...) ?
BTW, the idea of using kerning with the space charachters from AFMs
that do declare them is a good one, be it implemented in a MTX or ETX
Thierry Bouche, Grenoble.