[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: mathptm + cmex9
- To: te@informatik.uni-hannover.de
- Subject: Re: mathptm + cmex9
- From: Sebastian Rahtz <s.rahtz@elsevier.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 1 Jul 1998 08:14:28 +0100
- Cc: vieth@thphy.uni-duesseldorf.de
- In-Reply-To: <199806301909.VAA04244@gauss.informatik.uni-hannover.de>
- References: <199806301909.VAA04244@gauss.informatik.uni-hannover.de>
Thomas Esser writes:
>
> mathptm currently uses cmex9 which is a pity, because there is no
> cmex9.pfb in the BSR/AMS set.
>
> Since you are preparing a new set of the metrics: do you think that it
> is a good idea to stop using cmex9 for mathptm?
>
does cmex10 scaled down produce identical results in terms of spacing?
sebastian