[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fontinst modifications
- To: Thierry.Bouche@ujf-grenoble.fr
- Subject: Re: Fontinst modifications
- From: Ulrik Vieth <vieth@thphy.uni-duesseldorf.de>
- Date: Thu, 4 Jun 1998 18:15:12 +0200
- CC: s.rahtz@elsevier.co.uk, ajeffrey@cs.depaul.edu, fontinst@cogs.susx.ac.uk
- In-reply-to: <199806041611.SAA24132@mozart.ujf-grenoble.fr> (message fromThierry Bouche on Thu, 4 Jun 1998 18:11:31 +0200 (MET DST))
> Concernant « Re: Fontinst modifications », Ulrik Vieth écrit : «
> »
> » - why was the 9o/9d desingation or oldstyle expertized fonts
> » dropped and is it appropriate to use 9t/9e in that case?
> no!
So, should I put the 1.511 code back in fontinst.dtx?
(It won't be used anyway unless you call it explicitly.)
> » Personally, I do not particularly care about oldstyle digits,
> personnally i do (but i don't use \latinfamily anyway...)
So, how do you do it, and what do you call the resulting files?
Cheers, Ulrik.