[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Behaviour of \latinfamily
- To: Thierry.Bouche@ujf-grenoble.fr
- Subject: Re: Behaviour of \latinfamily
- From: Sebastian Rahtz <s.rahtz@elsevier.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 26 May 1998 15:00:06 +0100
- Cc: vieth@thphy.uni-duesseldorf.de, rebecca@astrid.u-net.com, fontinst@cogs.susx.ac.uk
- In-Reply-To: <199805261405.QAA06721@mozart.ujf-grenoble.fr>
- References: <l03130302b190604cd64b@[194.119.133.41]> <199805261326.PAA19062@attila.uni-duesseldorf.de> <199805261405.QAA06721@mozart.ujf-grenoble.fr>
Thierry Bouche writes:
> i don't think so, it is rather a simplified version that produces
> ligfull TFMs rather than VFs (at an early step in finst history, i
> believe that 8r base fonts were done with afm2tfm, then Constantin
> Kahn came with \installrawfonts...)
you are making me feel qute nostalgic for the good old days...
sebastian