[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: fontinst-1.8 pre-release
- To: Thierry.Bouche@ujf-grenoble.fr
- Subject: Re: fontinst-1.8 pre-release
- From: Ulrik Vieth <email@example.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Jun 1998 16:26:35 +0200
- CC: firstname.lastname@example.org
- In-reply-to: <199806241311.PAA13219@mozart.ujf-grenoble.fr> (message fromThierry Bouche on Wed, 24 Jun 1998 15:11:37 +0200 (MET DST))
> Hi, are there free slots in 8r.etx?
> It's getting very fashionable to include fj ligatures in new
> fonts(also fff BTW).
> I know that they won't find their way into T1 anyway...:-(
If you start adding more slots to 8r, there are even more glyphs to
consider apart form extra f-ligatures: I've seen some fonts which
include some additional mathematical glpyhs (apparently intended for
Mac-compatilbility), such as `Omega', `Delta', `pi', `summation',
`product', `integral' and `radical'. Of these at least `Omega' and
`radical' do appear in TS1, but are not accessible in 8r, even if
they appear as unencoded glyphs in the Type 1 or TrueType font.
P.S. The funny thing is that the metrics of these unencoded glyphs are
preserved and carried over in <font>8r.mtx as \setnotglyph, so the
\unfakable macro will draw a box that matches the glyph dimensions
rather than just a 5pt x 5pt square box.