[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Encoding for SC-fonts
- To: Fontinst-Mailinglist <fontinst@cogs.susx.ac.uk>
- Subject: Encoding for SC-fonts
- From: "Christian H. Kuhn" <kuhn@silchem.uni-wuerzburg.de>
- Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 12:03:18 +0100
- Organization: Bayerische =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Julius=2DMaximilians=2DUniversit=E4t?=, Lehrstuhl =?ISO-8859-15?Q?f=FCr?= Silicatchemie
- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0; en-US; rv:0.9.7) Gecko/20011221
Hi all,
When using \latinfamily{fgmx}, fontinst produces for the SC-fonts
virtual fonts with 9t/9e-encoding. For several reasons, i can't use
\latinfamily, and i have to do everything by \installfont. But i do
not understand why i should name the virtual SC-fonts as expertised
fonts. I have no fgmrc8x, only fgmrc8a, the use of fgmr8x to
complete fgmrc8a is not a good idea,, so i think the virtual fonts
should be named fgmrc7t/8t. Do the fgmrc9t/9e produced by
\latinfamily differ from the virtual fonts produced by
\installfont{fgmrc7t}{fgmrc7t,latin}{OT1}{OT1}{fgmx}{m}{n}{}
\installfont{fgmrc8t}{fgmrc8t,latin}{T1}{T1}{fgmx}{m}{n}{}
?
Or is there any completion to the mtx-list in the above example,
that causes the naming as expertised font?
Kind regards,
Chris
--
Bayerische Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg
Lehrstuhl für Silicatchemie
Röntgenring 11 Tel. +49-931-31-2454
97070 Würzburg Fax +49-931-31-2109